Programmable LED Array for Evaluating Artificial Light Sources to Improve Insect Trapping

We developed a programmable LED array to evaluate different wavelength illumination (UV, blue, green, yellow, amber, and red) and modulation schemes to improve catch rates in insect traps. The device can communicate through Bluetooth<sup>®</sup> with a simple Android app to update the operational settings to facilitate field experiments, including which LEDs to operate, when to operate (always, night only, or predefined intervals after sunset and/or before sunrise), and to change the LED intensities/modulation during operation. We used the devices to evaluate different wavelengths to improve catches in traps for coconut rhinoceros beetle (CRB; <i>Oryctes rhinoceros</i> Linnaeus) in the field, as well as to evaluate lighting preferences of Asian citrus psyllid (ACP; <i>Diaphorina citri</i> Kuwayama). In both cases, insects were most strongly attracted to constant UV illumination. However, CRB avoided traps with any "visible" wavelength LEDs placed in panels of traps, while ACP was moderately attracted to blue, yellow, and amber. For CRB, UV illumination of cups at the bottom of panel traps reduced catch rates compared to UV illumination higher in the panels of traps, consistent with observations of dorsal orientation towards light observed by other researchers in nocturnal beetles and moths. Finally, we provide some hardware design recommendations to improve the energy efficiency of similar devices for more widespread deployment in insect traps and for controlling the LEDs to evaluate the effects of intensity and modulation with minimal pulsing, which our observations suggest may result in insects avoiding traps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insects
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020170
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Insect behavior and control techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Programmable LED Array for Evaluating Artificial Light Sources to Improve Insect Trapping

Chandrika Ramadugu, Daniel M. Jenkins, Michael J. Melzer, Damon J. Crook et al.
4 citations
Insects
Insect behavior and control techniques
6.69
article

Programmable LED Array for Evaluating Artificial Light Sources to Improve Insect Trapping

Chandrika Ramadugu, Daniel M. Jenkins, Michael J. Melzer, Damon J. Crook, Mohsen Paryavi, Keith Weiser
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We developed a programmable LED array to evaluate different wavelength illumination (UV, blue, green, yellow, amber, and red) and modulation schemes to improve catch rates in insect traps. The device can communicate through Bluetooth<sup>®</sup> with a simple Android app to update the operational settings to facilitate field experiments, including which LEDs to operate, when to operate (always, night only, or predefined intervals after sunset and/or before sunrise), and to change the LED intensities/modulation during operation. We used the devices to evaluate different wavelengths to improve catches in traps for coconut rhinoceros beetle (CRB; <i>Oryctes rhinoceros</i> Linnaeus) in the field, as well as to evaluate lighting preferences of Asian citrus psyllid (ACP; <i>Diaphorina citri</i> Kuwayama). In both cases, insects were most strongly attracted to constant UV illumination. However, CRB avoided traps with any "visible" wavelength LEDs placed in panels of traps, while ACP was moderately attracted to blue, yellow, and amber. For CRB, UV illumination of cups at the bottom of panel traps reduced catch rates compared to UV illumination higher in the panels of traps, consistent with observations of dorsal orientation towards light observed by other researchers in nocturnal beetles and moths. Finally, we provide some hardware design recommendations to improve the energy efficiency of similar devices for more widespread deployment in insect traps and for controlling the LEDs to evaluate the effects of intensity and modulation with minimal pulsing, which our observations suggest may result in insects avoiding traps.

InsectsVol. 16(2)
University of California, Riverside (US), University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US), University of Hawaii System (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Insect behavior and control techniques
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.