Constitutional morality: The new instrument of justice?

Historian George Grote is credited with creating the theory of Constitutional Morality in the 1800s.According to Grote, Constitutional Morality is the peaceful coexistence of freedom and restraint in democratic administration.The theory of Constitutional Morality is a relatively new development in the body of judicially created constitutional law in India.The Supreme Court has used it in significant judgments, and it refers to the idea that constitutional governance requires not only adherence to the text of the Constitution but also a commitment to underlying constitutional values and principles.Doctrines like Basic Structure and Constitutional Morality have been used to impose implied constitutional limits on the Government, rooted in principles of the Constitution that judges consider essential to its existence.This means that judges can assess the legality of constitutional changes and Government activities by checking that they do not contradict the "spirit," "soul," or "conscience" of the Constitution.The Supreme Court has emphasized that adherence to constitutional values and principles is critical for maintaining a just and democratic society.Judges must use their discretion responsibly in applying these principles to specific cases.The Apex Court has also clarified that the doctrine of Constitutional Morality does not give judges unlimited power to impose their values on society but requires them to interpret the Constitution in light of its underlying principles and values.In this paper, the researchers trace the history of Constitutional Morality, its humble beginning, and eventual evolution.The paper also talks about its origin in India and its connection with the Chairman of the drafting committee of the Indian Constitution, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.Ambedkar's views on Constitutional Morality were rooted in his belief that adherence to constitutional values and principles was essential for maintaining a just and democratic society.Subsequently, it scrutinizes the recent developments that have taken place in the Indian Judiciary concerning the doctrine and how the notion of constitutional morality has made a comeback in our nation's jurisprudence.The researchers shall trace

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de drept constituţional
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62938/rdc-2024-2-0005
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutional morality: The new instrument of justice?

Afreen Afshar Alam
Revista de drept constituţional
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Constitutional morality: The new instrument of justice?

Afreen Afshar Alam
article en

Abstract

Historian George Grote is credited with creating the theory of Constitutional Morality in the 1800s.According to Grote, Constitutional Morality is the peaceful coexistence of freedom and restraint in democratic administration.The theory of Constitutional Morality is a relatively new development in the body of judicially created constitutional law in India.The Supreme Court has used it in significant judgments, and it refers to the idea that constitutional governance requires not only adherence to the text of the Constitution but also a commitment to underlying constitutional values and principles.Doctrines like Basic Structure and Constitutional Morality have been used to impose implied constitutional limits on the Government, rooted in principles of the Constitution that judges consider essential to its existence.This means that judges can assess the legality of constitutional changes and Government activities by checking that they do not contradict the "spirit," "soul," or "conscience" of the Constitution.The Supreme Court has emphasized that adherence to constitutional values and principles is critical for maintaining a just and democratic society.Judges must use their discretion responsibly in applying these principles to specific cases.The Apex Court has also clarified that the doctrine of Constitutional Morality does not give judges unlimited power to impose their values on society but requires them to interpret the Constitution in light of its underlying principles and values.In this paper, the researchers trace the history of Constitutional Morality, its humble beginning, and eventual evolution.The paper also talks about its origin in India and its connection with the Chairman of the drafting committee of the Indian Constitution, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.Ambedkar's views on Constitutional Morality were rooted in his belief that adherence to constitutional values and principles was essential for maintaining a just and democratic society.Subsequently, it scrutinizes the recent developments that have taken place in the Indian Judiciary concerning the doctrine and how the notion of constitutional morality has made a comeback in our nation's jurisprudence.The researchers shall trace

Revista de drept constituţionalVol. 2025(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.