Insights into Co‐Catalytic Single‐Atom‐Support Interactions for Boosting Sulfur Reduction Electrocatalysis

Abstract The use of single‐atom catalysts (SACs) with abundant electrocatalytic centers has been identified as the most desirable strategy to inhibit the shuttle effect in lithium‐sulfur batteries. However, the co‐contribution from SAC and its support via their interactions for accelerating the sulfur reduction reactions (SRR) has so far received little attention, since the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Herein, guided by density functional theory calculations, Cobalt‐SACs supported on a graphitic carbon nitride substrate (Co‐GCN), are selected to elucidate the co‐catalytic role in enhancing the SRR. The inherent high charge polarity of GCN, combined with its unique tri‐s‐triazine structure, offers multiple binding sites for lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) through Li−N bonds, as well as N/C‐coordinated frameworks for anchoring Co‐SACs. This structural configuration further amplifies the interaction with LiPSs via Co−S bonds. Consequently, both Co‐SACs and GCN actively participate in sulfur reduction electrocatalysis by binding LiPS intermediates, lowering the conversion energy barrier of SRR. Benefitting from such unique synergy, the battery demonstrates outstanding rate performance (718.9 mAh g −1 at 5.0 C) and yields a high areal capacity of up to 13.8 mAh cm −2 (1584.3 mAh g −1 ) under a high areal sulfur loading of 8.7 mg cm −2 but a low electrolyte/sulfur ratio of 5.0 μL mg −1 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Angewandte Chemie
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202425144
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights into Co‐Catalytic Single‐Atom‐Support Interactions for Boosting Sulfur Reduction Electrocatalysis

Ye Shang, Zhonghao Hu, Wuxing Hua, Quancheng Huang et al.
1 citations
Angewandte Chemie
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
0.36
article

Insights into Co‐Catalytic Single‐Atom‐Support Interactions for Boosting Sulfur Reduction Electrocatalysis

Ye Shang, Zhonghao Hu, Wuxing Hua, Quancheng Huang, Shuang Geng, Shuxi Dai, Ke Chen, Tianqi You, Huiyue Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The use of single‐atom catalysts (SACs) with abundant electrocatalytic centers has been identified as the most desirable strategy to inhibit the shuttle effect in lithium‐sulfur batteries. However, the co‐contribution from SAC and its support via their interactions for accelerating the sulfur reduction reactions (SRR) has so far received little attention, since the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Herein, guided by density functional theory calculations, Cobalt‐SACs supported on a graphitic carbon nitride substrate (Co‐GCN), are selected to elucidate the co‐catalytic role in enhancing the SRR. The inherent high charge polarity of GCN, combined with its unique tri‐s‐triazine structure, offers multiple binding sites for lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) through Li−N bonds, as well as N/C‐coordinated frameworks for anchoring Co‐SACs. This structural configuration further amplifies the interaction with LiPSs via Co−S bonds. Consequently, both Co‐SACs and GCN actively participate in sulfur reduction electrocatalysis by binding LiPS intermediates, lowering the conversion energy barrier of SRR. Benefitting from such unique synergy, the battery demonstrates outstanding rate performance (718.9 mAh g −1 at 5.0 C) and yields a high areal capacity of up to 13.8 mAh cm −2 (1584.3 mAh g −1 ) under a high areal sulfur loading of 8.7 mg cm −2 but a low electrolyte/sulfur ratio of 5.0 μL mg −1 .

Angewandte ChemieVol. 137(16)
Henan University (CN), University Town of Shenzhen (CN), Tsinghua–Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.