Safety profiles of IDH inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

Abstract Background With the increased use of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and cholangiocarcinoma, the toxicity of these drugs is a growing concern. This study aimed to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) of IDH inhibitors based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods AE reports for IDH inhibitors (enasidenib, ivosidenib, and olutasidenib) were collected and analyzed from the time of launch through the first quarter of 2024. Only IDH inhibitors reported as the target drug and coded as the primary suspect (PS) were included in the analysis. AEs were standardized and classified according to the preferred term (PT) and system organ classification (SOC) in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 26.0. Disproportionality analyses including the reporting odds ratio and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network were performed in data mining to assess IDH inhibitor-relatedAEs. Differentiation syndrome was the AE of special interest. Results The reports number of enasidenib, ivosidenib, and olutasidenib was 11 616 357, 10 067 250, and 2 563 464, respectively. A total of 80 enasidenib-related signals involving 15 SOCs, 78 ivosidenib-related signals involving 17 SOCs, and 7 olutasidenib-related signals involving 4 SOCs were obtained. The most signals reported were “blood and lymphatic system disorders,” “infections and infestations,” and “nervous system disorders” in enasidenib. For signals of ivosidenib, the most frequently reported were “gastrointestinal disorders,” “general disorders and administration site conditions,” and “injury, poisoning and procedural complications.” Ivosidenib was the only IDH inhibitor with signals in “cardiac disorders.” Differentiation syndrome events were reported in 89, 40, and 2 cases for enasidenib, ivosidenib, and olutasidenib, respectively. The median time to onset was 26–31 days for ivosidenib and enasidenib. AML was the most common indication in the differentiation syndrome reports. Conclusions Our study identifies potential AE signals associated with IDH inhibitors and provides a broader understanding of the safety. The safety profiles highlight the need for long-term safety monitoring of IDH inhibitor recipients. Promptly monitoring and intervention in specific organ systems depending on the type of IDH inhibitor may improve the overall survival or enhance the quality of life. In the future, it will be necessary to validate our findings in prospective large-scale studies and to investigate the underlying mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-025-00769-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety profiles of IDH inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

Peng Guo, Chenguang Jia, Qixiang Guo, Maoquan Qin et al.
1 citations
Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
1.77
article

Safety profiles of IDH inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

Peng Guo, Chenguang Jia, Qixiang Guo, Maoquan Qin, Han Zhou, Bin Wang, Yanming Li, Yixin Sun, Ximu Sun, Y. Luo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background With the increased use of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and cholangiocarcinoma, the toxicity of these drugs is a growing concern. This study aimed to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) of IDH inhibitors based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods AE reports for IDH inhibitors (enasidenib, ivosidenib, and olutasidenib) were collected and analyzed from the time of launch through the first quarter of 2024. Only IDH inhibitors reported as the target drug and coded as the primary suspect (PS) were included in the analysis. AEs were standardized and classified according to the preferred term (PT) and system organ classification (SOC) in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 26.0. Disproportionality analyses including the reporting odds ratio and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network were performed in data mining to assess IDH inhibitor-relatedAEs. Differentiation syndrome was the AE of special interest. Results The reports number of enasidenib, ivosidenib, and olutasidenib was 11 616 357, 10 067 250, and 2 563 464, respectively. A total of 80 enasidenib-related signals involving 15 SOCs, 78 ivosidenib-related signals involving 17 SOCs, and 7 olutasidenib-related signals involving 4 SOCs were obtained. The most signals reported were “blood and lymphatic system disorders,” “infections and infestations,” and “nervous system disorders” in enasidenib. For signals of ivosidenib, the most frequently reported were “gastrointestinal disorders,” “general disorders and administration site conditions,” and “injury, poisoning and procedural complications.” Ivosidenib was the only IDH inhibitor with signals in “cardiac disorders.” Differentiation syndrome events were reported in 89, 40, and 2 cases for enasidenib, ivosidenib, and olutasidenib, respectively. The median time to onset was 26–31 days for ivosidenib and enasidenib. AML was the most common indication in the differentiation syndrome reports. Conclusions Our study identifies potential AE signals associated with IDH inhibitors and provides a broader understanding of the safety. The safety profiles highlight the need for long-term safety monitoring of IDH inhibitor recipients. Promptly monitoring and intervention in specific organ systems depending on the type of IDH inhibitor may improve the overall survival or enhance the quality of life. In the future, it will be necessary to validate our findings in prospective large-scale studies and to investigate the underlying mechanisms.

Future Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesVol. 11(1)
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Children’s Hospital (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.