Negative regulation of cannabinoid receptor 2‑induced tumorigenic effect by sphingosine‑1‑phosphate receptor 5 activation

G protein‑coupled receptors (GPCR), also known as seven‑transmembrane proteins, serve a role in transmitting extracellular information into the cellular environment. Type 2 cannabinoid receptors (CB<sub>2</sub>) and type 5 sphingosine‑1‑phosphate receptor (S1P<sub>5</sub>) are GPCRs that are activated by biolipids and involved in tumor progression in various cancer types. At present, effects of crosstalk between CB<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>5</sub> receptors on tumor cell proliferation and migration in gliomas are not fully understood. The present study screened S1Ps for potential interactions with CB<sub>2</sub> using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis. S1P<sub>5</sub> interacted strongly and specifically with CB<sub>2</sub>. 293T cells were transfected with CB<sub>2</sub> tagged with Venus and S1P<sub>5</sub> tagged with mCherry to investigate the cellular localization of both receptors. After 24 h, Confocal microscopy analysis revealed that, in the absence of agonists, both receptors were predominantly localized at the plasma membrane. Notably, both receptors were co‑internalized from the membrane to the cytoplasm upon individual and combined activation. The effects of co‑activation of both receptors on tumor progression were investigated using U‑87 MG, the human glioblastoma cell line. Activation of CB<sub>2</sub> induced an increase in cell migration and proliferation, which were downregulated following the co‑activation of S1P<sub>5</sub>. Furthermore, activation of S1P<sub>5</sub> significantly attenuated the upregulation of tumor progression‑related genes, including zinc finger protein 91, activating transcription factor 3, Ki67, basic transcription factor 3, and p21, induced by CB<sub>2</sub> activation. This suggests that S1P<sub>5</sub> exerts a negative regulatory effect on CB<sub>2</sub>‑mediated tumor progression. The present findings provide evidence of the crosstalk between CB<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>5</sub>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology Reports
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2025.8874
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative regulation of cannabinoid receptor 2‑induced tumorigenic effect by sphingosine‑1‑phosphate receptor 5 activation

Sungho Ghil, Yuna Kim
4 citations
Oncology Reports
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
3.22
article

Negative regulation of cannabinoid receptor 2‑induced tumorigenic effect by sphingosine‑1‑phosphate receptor 5 activation

Sungho Ghil, Yuna Kim
article en
4 citations

Abstract

G protein‑coupled receptors (GPCR), also known as seven‑transmembrane proteins, serve a role in transmitting extracellular information into the cellular environment. Type 2 cannabinoid receptors (CB<sub>2</sub>) and type 5 sphingosine‑1‑phosphate receptor (S1P<sub>5</sub>) are GPCRs that are activated by biolipids and involved in tumor progression in various cancer types. At present, effects of crosstalk between CB<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>5</sub> receptors on tumor cell proliferation and migration in gliomas are not fully understood. The present study screened S1Ps for potential interactions with CB<sub>2</sub> using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis. S1P<sub>5</sub> interacted strongly and specifically with CB<sub>2</sub>. 293T cells were transfected with CB<sub>2</sub> tagged with Venus and S1P<sub>5</sub> tagged with mCherry to investigate the cellular localization of both receptors. After 24 h, Confocal microscopy analysis revealed that, in the absence of agonists, both receptors were predominantly localized at the plasma membrane. Notably, both receptors were co‑internalized from the membrane to the cytoplasm upon individual and combined activation. The effects of co‑activation of both receptors on tumor progression were investigated using U‑87 MG, the human glioblastoma cell line. Activation of CB<sub>2</sub> induced an increase in cell migration and proliferation, which were downregulated following the co‑activation of S1P<sub>5</sub>. Furthermore, activation of S1P<sub>5</sub> significantly attenuated the upregulation of tumor progression‑related genes, including zinc finger protein 91, activating transcription factor 3, Ki67, basic transcription factor 3, and p21, induced by CB<sub>2</sub> activation. This suggests that S1P<sub>5</sub> exerts a negative regulatory effect on CB<sub>2</sub>‑mediated tumor progression. The present findings provide evidence of the crosstalk between CB<sub>2</sub> and S1P<sub>5</sub>.

Oncology ReportsVol. 53(3)
Kyonggi University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Negative regulation of cannabinoid receptor 2‑induced tumorigenic effect by sphingosine‑1‑phosphate receptor 5 activation — Sungho Ghil, Yuna Kim · Oncology Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS