The (non)enactment of intelligent accountability through stakeholder engagement: A micro-processual perspective

This paper examines the role of individual actions in shaping accountability relationships by adopting a micro-level perspective. Drawing on the concept of intelligent accountability, it presents a three-phase processual model to analyse the unfolding of a stakeholder engagement plan within a large firm. Despite the firm's president aiming to foster inclusion and participation, managers exhibited varied and often conflicting micro-actions during face-to-face stakeholder meetings. This misalignment led to an ‘intent-action paralysis,’ resulting in unintended relational consequences that hindered change and long-term stakeholder relationships. The study underscores the value of micro-processual analysis in advancing accountability and stakeholder engagement research, offering insights into their inherently relational dynamics. It contributes to the broader discussion on the challenges of enacting intelligent accountability, stakeholder engagement and the associated responsibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Accounting Review
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101590
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The (non)enactment of intelligent accountability through stakeholder engagement: A micro-processual perspective

Emilio Passetti, Lara Bianchi, Massimo Contrafatto
3 citations
The British Accounting Review
Management and Organizational Studies
8.29
article

The (non)enactment of intelligent accountability through stakeholder engagement: A micro-processual perspective

Emilio Passetti, Lara Bianchi, Massimo Contrafatto
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the role of individual actions in shaping accountability relationships by adopting a micro-level perspective. Drawing on the concept of intelligent accountability, it presents a three-phase processual model to analyse the unfolding of a stakeholder engagement plan within a large firm. Despite the firm's president aiming to foster inclusion and participation, managers exhibited varied and often conflicting micro-actions during face-to-face stakeholder meetings. This misalignment led to an ‘intent-action paralysis,’ resulting in unintended relational consequences that hindered change and long-term stakeholder relationships. The study underscores the value of micro-processual analysis in advancing accountability and stakeholder engagement research, offering insights into their inherently relational dynamics. It contributes to the broader discussion on the challenges of enacting intelligent accountability, stakeholder engagement and the associated responsibilities.

The British Accounting ReviewVol. 57(6)
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Sussex (GB), Marconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.