Hybridised public management: Introduction to the special issue

Abstract Our analysis of the literature indicates a growing prominence of hybridity within the field of public administration. Hybrid arrangements incorporate ambiguities and controversies, but they also represent opportunities for joint action and goal achievement. The difficulties inherent in hybridity originate from the dichotomous view of the public–private divide and the underdeveloped measurement instruments. The contributions of this special issue address these challenges, providing extensive evidence as to the empirical reality of the manifold aspects of hybrid public management. Encouragingly, this knowledge enabled us to revisit existing hybridity models and provide an up‐to‐date Framework for Hybridised Public Management to further advance the development of theory and practice. Drawing on this framework, we suggest future research in key areas. Points for practitioners Public managers in hybrid organisations must adeptly communicate with varied audiences, each with distinct expectations. This requires tailoring messages to demonstrate the organisation's multi‐faceted value creation, encompassing public, private, and social benefits, to secure stakeholder buy‐in and support. The integration of divergent goals and logics in hybrid organisations demands innovative organisational designs to manage these incongruences. Hybrid organisational structures and processes should foster cooperation among public, private, and civil society actors. Traditional financial metrics often inadequately capture the complexity and societal value of hybrid arrangements. Practitioners should adopt and develop performance measurement systems that reflect the multi‐dimensional outcomes of hybridity, balancing financial, social, and public value considerations. The inherent ambiguity in hybrid organisations can lead to excessive oversight that hinders innovation and goal alignment. Practitioners need to establish governance frameworks that mitigate ambiguity while ensuring accountability and preserving the core mission of the hybrid entity. Public–private cooperation can be instrumental in leveraging additional public financing, not only for widening the resource base but also for gaining legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Public Administration
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.70000
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybridised public management: Introduction to the special issue

Jarmo Vakkuri, David E. Mills, Adina Iulia Dudau, Jan‐Erik Johanson
3 citations
Australian Journal of Public Administration
Public Policy and Administration Research
10.97
article

Hybridised public management: Introduction to the special issue

Jarmo Vakkuri, David E. Mills, Adina Iulia Dudau, Jan‐Erik Johanson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Our analysis of the literature indicates a growing prominence of hybridity within the field of public administration. Hybrid arrangements incorporate ambiguities and controversies, but they also represent opportunities for joint action and goal achievement. The difficulties inherent in hybridity originate from the dichotomous view of the public–private divide and the underdeveloped measurement instruments. The contributions of this special issue address these challenges, providing extensive evidence as to the empirical reality of the manifold aspects of hybrid public management. Encouragingly, this knowledge enabled us to revisit existing hybridity models and provide an up‐to‐date Framework for Hybridised Public Management to further advance the development of theory and practice. Drawing on this framework, we suggest future research in key areas. Points for practitioners Public managers in hybrid organisations must adeptly communicate with varied audiences, each with distinct expectations. This requires tailoring messages to demonstrate the organisation's multi‐faceted value creation, encompassing public, private, and social benefits, to secure stakeholder buy‐in and support. The integration of divergent goals and logics in hybrid organisations demands innovative organisational designs to manage these incongruences. Hybrid organisational structures and processes should foster cooperation among public, private, and civil society actors. Traditional financial metrics often inadequately capture the complexity and societal value of hybrid arrangements. Practitioners should adopt and develop performance measurement systems that reflect the multi‐dimensional outcomes of hybridity, balancing financial, social, and public value considerations. The inherent ambiguity in hybrid organisations can lead to excessive oversight that hinders innovation and goal alignment. Practitioners need to establish governance frameworks that mitigate ambiguity while ensuring accountability and preserving the core mission of the hybrid entity. Public–private cooperation can be instrumental in leveraging additional public financing, not only for widening the resource base but also for gaining legitimacy.

Australian Journal of Public AdministrationVol. 84(2)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Tampere University (FI), Adam Smith Institute (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), Norwegian School of Economics (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Public Policy and Administration Research
10.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.