Probabilistic models for shear strength of circular and square concrete-filled steel tubes

Concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns are pivotal in modern structural design, leveraging the synergistic properties of their materials while addressing structural shortcomings. However, forecasting their shear capacity remains a formidable challenge, owing to the intricate load transfer mechanisms involved. This study utilizes a Bayesian model updating technique, complemented by reliability analysis, drawing upon the most extensive shear test database to date for both circular and square CFST columns, encompassing 314 high-quality datasets. Through Bayesian updating, two explicit formulas for shear capacity estimation are derived and validated via reliability analysis, facilitating a comprehensive evaluation of load and resistance factor design. Key conclusions include the following: (a) Among existing empirical models, those of Mansouri and Lin demonstrate the highest predictive accuracy for shear capacity in circular and square columns, with R2 values of 0.920 and 0.964, although they exhibit relatively high coefficients of variation (COVs) of 0.162 and 0.172, respectively, in predicted-to-measured ratios. (b) Bayesian-derived formulas, incorporating both prior knowledge and empirical data, offer enhanced precision and physical relevance, achieving R2 values of 0.970 and 0.975, with lower COVs of 0.121 and 0.163 for circular and square columns, respectively. (c) The proposed models’ reliability indices exceed 3.7 under the resistance reduction factor method, meeting brittle failure safety criteria. In partial safety factor design, the square column formula is safe, while the circular column model slightly falls short. To meet safety standards, the study recommends increasing partial safety factors for concrete compressive strength and steel yield strength from 1.4 and 1.1 to 1.55 and 1.2, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0250829
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic models for shear strength of circular and square concrete-filled steel tubes

Jian-Bo Zang, Wenjun Wu, Yong Yu, Jia Yan
8 citations
AIP Advances
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
7.63
article

Probabilistic models for shear strength of circular and square concrete-filled steel tubes

Jian-Bo Zang, Wenjun Wu, Yong Yu, Jia Yan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns are pivotal in modern structural design, leveraging the synergistic properties of their materials while addressing structural shortcomings. However, forecasting their shear capacity remains a formidable challenge, owing to the intricate load transfer mechanisms involved. This study utilizes a Bayesian model updating technique, complemented by reliability analysis, drawing upon the most extensive shear test database to date for both circular and square CFST columns, encompassing 314 high-quality datasets. Through Bayesian updating, two explicit formulas for shear capacity estimation are derived and validated via reliability analysis, facilitating a comprehensive evaluation of load and resistance factor design. Key conclusions include the following: (a) Among existing empirical models, those of Mansouri and Lin demonstrate the highest predictive accuracy for shear capacity in circular and square columns, with R2 values of 0.920 and 0.964, although they exhibit relatively high coefficients of variation (COVs) of 0.162 and 0.172, respectively, in predicted-to-measured ratios. (b) Bayesian-derived formulas, incorporating both prior knowledge and empirical data, offer enhanced precision and physical relevance, achieving R2 values of 0.970 and 0.975, with lower COVs of 0.121 and 0.163 for circular and square columns, respectively. (c) The proposed models’ reliability indices exceed 3.7 under the resistance reduction factor method, meeting brittle failure safety criteria. In partial safety factor design, the square column formula is safe, while the circular column model slightly falls short. To meet safety standards, the study recommends increasing partial safety factors for concrete compressive strength and steel yield strength from 1.4 and 1.1 to 1.55 and 1.2, respectively.

AIP AdvancesVol. 15(2)
Dongguan University of Technology (CN), Guangzhou Maritime College (CN), Guangdong Provincial Academy of Building Research Group (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
7.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.