A Curious Observation of a Solar Eclipse in 1630

Abstract How and where did people observe a solar eclipse in Paris in 1630? This study will analyze the content of a letter describing in detail a collective observation of the eclipse that occurred on June 10, 1630. We will then take a closer look at how this celestial phenomenon was studied, both from a material and practical (instruments, techniques, general organization) point of view. Having identified the main observer as a Capuchin friar prognosticator, the study of the material culture of this event will allow us to delve into observational knowledge concerning the Capuchin religious order via a case study. This letter demonstrates well how focusing on places, instruments, and practices of observation can lead to a better understanding of the historical actors making observations, as well as their beliefs touching the objects observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuncius
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18253911-bja10141
Primary Topic
History of Science and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Curious Observation of a Solar Eclipse in 1630

Dalia Deias
Nuncius
History of Science and Medicine
article

A Curious Observation of a Solar Eclipse in 1630

Dalia Deias
article en

Abstract

Abstract How and where did people observe a solar eclipse in Paris in 1630? This study will analyze the content of a letter describing in detail a collective observation of the eclipse that occurred on June 10, 1630. We will then take a closer look at how this celestial phenomenon was studied, both from a material and practical (instruments, techniques, general organization) point of view. Having identified the main observer as a Capuchin friar prognosticator, the study of the material culture of this event will allow us to delve into observational knowledge concerning the Capuchin religious order via a case study. This letter demonstrates well how focusing on places, instruments, and practices of observation can lead to a better understanding of the historical actors making observations, as well as their beliefs touching the objects observed.

NunciusVol. 40(1)
Université de Bordeaux (FR), Centre Alexandre Koyré (FR), Sciences, Philosophie, Humanités (FR), École des hautes études en sciences sociales (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
History of Science and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.