Screening tool for eating problems – child version (STEP-C) development of cut-off scores and examination of validity

Objectives: The goal of this study was to develop cut-off scores for the Screening Tool for Eating Problems–Child Version (STEP-C) and demonstrate the validity of these scores. Methods: Participants included children referred to a feeding clinic (15-226 months) and a comparison group of children (15-215 months) seen for well-child visits who had not received feeding therapy. ROC analysis was used to develop cut-off scores to differentiate children into clinical and non-clinical groupings. Validity testing was also conducted by comparing the scores of the STEP-C clinical and non-clinical groups on four additional measures including a measure of diet variety, a texture measure, an oral behavior measure, and a sensory measure specific to feeding. Results: Using the STEP-C cut-off scores, 88% of the children referred for feeding problems and 18.8% of the comparison group had scores that met or exceeded the cut-off and identified with a feeding problem. The children in the clinical group, consisting of children whose STEP-C scores met or exceeded the cut-off, ate a more limited variety of foods, consumed fewer textures, had more sensory feeding problems, and had more oral behavior problems than children in the non-clinical comparison group. Conclusions: The STEP-C, a screening measure of children’s feeding problems, was able to accurately identify children with feeding problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2025.2459168
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Screening tool for eating problems – child version (STEP-C) development of cut-off scores and examination of validity

Deyu Pan, Keith Williams
1 links
International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
article

Screening tool for eating problems – child version (STEP-C) development of cut-off scores and examination of validity

Deyu Pan, Keith Williams
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to develop cut-off scores for the Screening Tool for Eating Problems–Child Version (STEP-C) and demonstrate the validity of these scores. Methods: Participants included children referred to a feeding clinic (15-226 months) and a comparison group of children (15-215 months) seen for well-child visits who had not received feeding therapy. ROC analysis was used to develop cut-off scores to differentiate children into clinical and non-clinical groupings. Validity testing was also conducted by comparing the scores of the STEP-C clinical and non-clinical groups on four additional measures including a measure of diet variety, a texture measure, an oral behavior measure, and a sensory measure specific to feeding. Results: Using the STEP-C cut-off scores, 88% of the children referred for feeding problems and 18.8% of the comparison group had scores that met or exceeded the cut-off and identified with a feeding problem. The children in the clinical group, consisting of children whose STEP-C scores met or exceeded the cut-off, ate a more limited variety of foods, consumed fewer textures, had more sensory feeding problems, and had more oral behavior problems than children in the non-clinical comparison group. Conclusions: The STEP-C, a screening measure of children’s feeding problems, was able to accurately identify children with feeding problems.

International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
Pennsylvania State University (US), Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.