A Resident-Centric Framework for Postdisaster Infrastructure Recovery: Characterizing Hierarchical Needs and Fulfillment Cycles to Assess Urban Resilience

Allocating resources effectively for the recovery of facilities and services after a disaster is essential to improve the sustainability and well-being of affected residents who face various challenges and pressures. A significant challenge in this process is identifying vulnerabilities and strategically prioritizing resource to address residents’ postdisaster needs. These needs change over time, including both their urgency and the extent to which they are fulfilled, as facilities recover. However, currently, no quantitative computational model characterizes these needs and further guides resilience evaluation and infrastructure rush repair. This study introduces an evaluation framework that monitors residents’ unmet needs by keeping track of the needs they report and addressing feedback gathered from social sensing. Residents’ postdisaster needs are first identified by clustering 336,928 pieces of appeal and feedback data using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling. These needs are then validated through a Delphi study and modeled into a three-level hierarchy. Then, we characterized residents’ expected recovery curve over time as a benchmark and used the actual recovery based on needs fulfillment to quantify the discrepancy, which served as the proxy for resilience. The proposed framework was validated using empirical data from a regular and an extreme rainstorm that occurred in 2020 and 2023 in Beijing. The findings offer valuable insights into how residents’ most urgent needs and the corresponding types of infrastructure repair needed change across different recovery phases and for different types of rainstorms. These insights help guide policymakers in improving the effectiveness of disaster response and in taking proactive measures for infrastructure maintenance to prevent future disasters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management in Engineering
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jmenea.meeng-6248
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Resident-Centric Framework for Postdisaster Infrastructure Recovery: Characterizing Hierarchical Needs and Fulfillment Cycles to Assess Urban Resilience

Tianguang Meng, Helen X. H. Bao, Zhizhi Lin, Xiaoshan Zhou et al.
7 citations
Journal of Management in Engineering
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
6.67
article

A Resident-Centric Framework for Postdisaster Infrastructure Recovery: Characterizing Hierarchical Needs and Fulfillment Cycles to Assess Urban Resilience

Tianguang Meng, Helen X. H. Bao, Zhizhi Lin, Xiaoshan Zhou, Zeyu Zhao, Fang Dongping
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Allocating resources effectively for the recovery of facilities and services after a disaster is essential to improve the sustainability and well-being of affected residents who face various challenges and pressures. A significant challenge in this process is identifying vulnerabilities and strategically prioritizing resource to address residents’ postdisaster needs. These needs change over time, including both their urgency and the extent to which they are fulfilled, as facilities recover. However, currently, no quantitative computational model characterizes these needs and further guides resilience evaluation and infrastructure rush repair. This study introduces an evaluation framework that monitors residents’ unmet needs by keeping track of the needs they report and addressing feedback gathered from social sensing. Residents’ postdisaster needs are first identified by clustering 336,928 pieces of appeal and feedback data using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling. These needs are then validated through a Delphi study and modeled into a three-level hierarchy. Then, we characterized residents’ expected recovery curve over time as a benchmark and used the actual recovery based on needs fulfillment to quantify the discrepancy, which served as the proxy for resilience. The proposed framework was validated using empirical data from a regular and an extreme rainstorm that occurred in 2020 and 2023 in Beijing. The findings offer valuable insights into how residents’ most urgent needs and the corresponding types of infrastructure repair needed change across different recovery phases and for different types of rainstorms. These insights help guide policymakers in improving the effectiveness of disaster response and in taking proactive measures for infrastructure maintenance to prevent future disasters.

Journal of Management in EngineeringVol. 41(3)
University of Cambridge (GB), University of Michigan (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
6.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.