The Constructionalization and Adjective-Quantity Structures in Modern Chinese

This study analyzes the constructional patterns in modern Chinese adjective-quantity expressions, specifically examining the formations ‘adjective+numeral+classifier’, ‘numeral+adjective+classifier’, and ‘numeral+classifier+adjective’. The analysis shows that specific structures correspond to distinct adjective types, such as ‘一+ adjective + classifier’ emphasizing basic physical attributes, and ‘一+ classifier + adjective’ highlighting complex emotional or abstract states. The study further reveals how these combinations reflect unique developmental processes, expanding classifiers’ and numerals’ syntactic roles. Through contrastive analysis, it clarifies that while Chinese uses succinct constructs for degree expression, Korean tends to rely on adverbs or dependent nouns for greater nuance. These insights contribute to understanding the syntactic growth in Chinese and offer a comparative view on degree expression across languages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25021/jcll.2024.12.149.31
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Constructionalization and Adjective-Quantity Structures in Modern Chinese

Hwa-jin Jin
The Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

The Constructionalization and Adjective-Quantity Structures in Modern Chinese

Hwa-jin Jin
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the constructional patterns in modern Chinese adjective-quantity expressions, specifically examining the formations ‘adjective+numeral+classifier’, ‘numeral+adjective+classifier’, and ‘numeral+classifier+adjective’. The analysis shows that specific structures correspond to distinct adjective types, such as ‘一+ adjective + classifier’ emphasizing basic physical attributes, and ‘一+ classifier + adjective’ highlighting complex emotional or abstract states. The study further reveals how these combinations reflect unique developmental processes, expanding classifiers’ and numerals’ syntactic roles. Through contrastive analysis, it clarifies that while Chinese uses succinct constructs for degree expression, Korean tends to rely on adverbs or dependent nouns for greater nuance. These insights contribute to understanding the syntactic growth in Chinese and offer a comparative view on degree expression across languages.

The Journal of Chinese Language and LiteratureVol. 149
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Constructionalization and Adjective-Quantity Structures in Modern Chinese — Hwa-jin Jin · The Journal of Chinese Language and Literature (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS