Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI

BackgroundLittle is known of the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusivity variables, especially kurtosis in healthy ovaries.PurposeTo evaluate the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusion variables in pelvic MRI of the ovaries.Material and MethodsThis prospective, single-centre study consisted of repeated 1.5-T and 3-T examinations in 30 female volunteers (mean age=27.9 years, age range=20.3-45.2 years) from July 2017 to September 2019. Multi b-value DWI 0, 50, 100, 800, 1500, 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup> was acquired over three timepoints during the menstrual cycle. Ovaries were segmented at b = 1500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>. Median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and advanced kurtosis parameters D<sub>app</sub> and K<sub>app</sub> were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the variations of diffusivity variables being compared between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI using a Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.ResultsMedian ADC and D<sub>app</sub> (µm²/ms) did not statistically differ. Median ADC were 1.509 (range=1.371-1.610), 1.619 (range=1.463-1.747), and 1.511 (range=1.423-1.639) at 1.5 T; 1.542 (range=1.428-1.682), 1.658 (range=1.510-1.806), and 1.572 (range=1.455-1.709) at 3 T (<i>P</i> = 0.14, 0.19, and 0.07), whereas median D<sub>app</sub> were 2.024 (range=1.913-2.152), 2.192 (range=2.010-2.327), and 2.045 (range=1.958-2.170) at 1.5 T; 2.013 (range=1.952-2.188), 2.179 (range=2.018-2.327), and 2.082 (range=1.959-2.194) at 3 T (<i>P</i> = 0.77, 0.99, and 0.34) for timepoints 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical comparison of K<sub>app</sub> revealed significant differences for all timepoints: 0.629 (range=0.595-0.652), 0.604 (range=0.574-0.651), and 0.622 (range=0.581-0.664) at 1.5 T; 0.601 (range=0.563-0.626), 0.567 (range=0.526-0.633), and 0.599 (range=0.541-0.650) at 3 T (<i>P</i> < 0.001, 0.005, and 0.03).ConclusionDiffusivity mapping in the ovaries provides similar absolute median diffusion values, but statistically significant differences in absolute kurtosis values between 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Radiologica
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241313021
Primary Topic
MRI in cancer diagnosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI

Judith Pantke, Frederik Bernd Laun, Theresa Mokry, Hans‐Ulrich Kauczor et al.
Acta Radiologica
MRI in cancer diagnosis
article

Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI

Judith Pantke, Frederik Bernd Laun, Theresa Mokry, Hans‐Ulrich Kauczor, Sebastian Bickelhaupt, Tristan Anselm Kuder, H Schlemmer
article en

Abstract

BackgroundLittle is known of the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusivity variables, especially kurtosis in healthy ovaries.PurposeTo evaluate the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusion variables in pelvic MRI of the ovaries.Material and MethodsThis prospective, single-centre study consisted of repeated 1.5-T and 3-T examinations in 30 female volunteers (mean age=27.9 years, age range=20.3-45.2 years) from July 2017 to September 2019. Multi b-value DWI 0, 50, 100, 800, 1500, 2000 s/mm<sup>2</sup> was acquired over three timepoints during the menstrual cycle. Ovaries were segmented at b = 1500 s/mm<sup>2</sup>. Median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and advanced kurtosis parameters D<sub>app</sub> and K<sub>app</sub> were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the variations of diffusivity variables being compared between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI using a Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.ResultsMedian ADC and D<sub>app</sub> (µm²/ms) did not statistically differ. Median ADC were 1.509 (range=1.371-1.610), 1.619 (range=1.463-1.747), and 1.511 (range=1.423-1.639) at 1.5 T; 1.542 (range=1.428-1.682), 1.658 (range=1.510-1.806), and 1.572 (range=1.455-1.709) at 3 T (<i>P</i> = 0.14, 0.19, and 0.07), whereas median D<sub>app</sub> were 2.024 (range=1.913-2.152), 2.192 (range=2.010-2.327), and 2.045 (range=1.958-2.170) at 1.5 T; 2.013 (range=1.952-2.188), 2.179 (range=2.018-2.327), and 2.082 (range=1.959-2.194) at 3 T (<i>P</i> = 0.77, 0.99, and 0.34) for timepoints 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical comparison of K<sub>app</sub> revealed significant differences for all timepoints: 0.629 (range=0.595-0.652), 0.604 (range=0.574-0.651), and 0.622 (range=0.581-0.664) at 1.5 T; 0.601 (range=0.563-0.626), 0.567 (range=0.526-0.633), and 0.599 (range=0.541-0.650) at 3 T (<i>P</i> < 0.001, 0.005, and 0.03).ConclusionDiffusivity mapping in the ovaries provides similar absolute median diffusion values, but statistically significant differences in absolute kurtosis values between 1.5 T and 3 T.

Acta RadiologicaVol. 66(5)
German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
MRI in cancer diagnosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.