Measuring Post-Exertional Malaise with DePaul Symptom Questionnaires: Challenges and Opportunities

Following mental or physical exertion, patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) experience Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM). Although self-report questions represent less expensive and invasive procedures to assess PEM, variability in the wording of the symptom can cause reliability and validity problems. If different PEM measures are used in studies, this could create difficulties in replicating findings, identifying biomarkers, and determining effective treatments for patients. The objective of this article is to describe the challenges and opportunities of the PEM questions of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaires (DSQ) in specific. The five PEM DSQ items can identify 97% of patients with ME/CFS. A brief DSQ-PEM instrument has now been constructed that consists of five DSQ PEM items and five DSQ supplementary items such as symptom duration and how quickly patients would recover from activities. A more comprehensive instrument called the DePaul Post-Exertional Malaise Questionnaire assesses a more comprehensive list of PEM triggers and the duration and length of recovery time from PEM. In this article, we show how the DSQ’s PEM self-report items can provide clues to ME/CFS pathophysiology as well as how these items can be used as outcome measures. Future research should focus on contrasting and comparing different ways of eliciting PEM, assessing relationships between PEM self-report questionnaires and biomarkers, and examining the impact of treatment trials on PEM.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
OBM Neurobiology
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2501267
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Post-Exertional Malaise with DePaul Symptom Questionnaires: Challenges and Opportunities

Leonard A. Jason
4 citations
OBM Neurobiology
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
5.88
article

Measuring Post-Exertional Malaise with DePaul Symptom Questionnaires: Challenges and Opportunities

Leonard A. Jason
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Following mental or physical exertion, patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) experience Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM). Although self-report questions represent less expensive and invasive procedures to assess PEM, variability in the wording of the symptom can cause reliability and validity problems. If different PEM measures are used in studies, this could create difficulties in replicating findings, identifying biomarkers, and determining effective treatments for patients. The objective of this article is to describe the challenges and opportunities of the PEM questions of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaires (DSQ) in specific. The five PEM DSQ items can identify 97% of patients with ME/CFS. A brief DSQ-PEM instrument has now been constructed that consists of five DSQ PEM items and five DSQ supplementary items such as symptom duration and how quickly patients would recover from activities. A more comprehensive instrument called the DePaul Post-Exertional Malaise Questionnaire assesses a more comprehensive list of PEM triggers and the duration and length of recovery time from PEM. In this article, we show how the DSQ’s PEM self-report items can provide clues to ME/CFS pathophysiology as well as how these items can be used as outcome measures. Future research should focus on contrasting and comparing different ways of eliciting PEM, assessing relationships between PEM self-report questionnaires and biomarkers, and examining the impact of treatment trials on PEM.

OBM NeurobiologyVol. 09(01)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
5.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.