Early Prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of Lithium‐Ion Cells Using Ensemble and Non‐Ensemble Algorithms

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion cells have become an important part of our daily lives. They are used to power mobile phones, laptops and more recently electric vehicles (both two‐ and four‐wheelers). The chemical behavior of the cells is rather complex and non‐linear. For reliable and sustainable use of the cells for practical applications, it is imperative to predict the precise pace at which their capacity will degrade. More importantly, the lifetime of the cells must be predicted at an early stage, which would accelerate development and design optimization of the cells. However, most of the existing methods cannot predict the lifetime at an early stage, since there is a weak correlation between the cell capacity and lifetime. In this study for accurate forecasting of the battery lifetime, the patterns of the parameters such as cell current, voltage, temperature, charging time, internal resistance, and capacity were examined during charging and discharging cycle of the cell. Twelve manually crafted features were prepared from these parameters. The dataset for the features was created using the raw data of the first 100 cycles of 124 cells. Six ensemble and non‐ensemble machine learning algorithms, namely, multiple linear regression (MLR), decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were trained with the features for predicting the life‐cycle of the cells. The R 2 and root mean squared error (RMSE) values of MLR, decision tree, SVM, GBM, LGBM, and XGBoost were found to be 0.72 and 201, 0.83 and 155, 0.85 and 146, 0.92 and 100, 0.9 and 112, and 0.94 and 95, respectively. The prediction accuracy of lithium‐ion cell life‐time was found to be the best with the XGBoost algorithm. This shows that only first 100 cycles are required foraccurately predicting the number of cycles the lithium‐ion cell can work for. Lastly, the results of the study were compared with the available studies in the literature. Three studies were chosen, and the RMSE of the method proposed in this study was found to be higher than the three studies by 43, 17, and 20. Therefore, the proposed method is a suitable option for predicting the lifetime of lithium‐ion cells during the early stages of its development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Storage
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.70133
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of Lithium‐Ion Cells Using Ensemble and Non‐Ensemble Algorithms

S. Thiyagarajan, Dhowmya Bhatt, Fethi Aloui, Ankit Sonthalia et al.
3 citations
Energy Storage
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.05
article

Early Prediction of the Remaining Useful Life of Lithium‐Ion Cells Using Ensemble and Non‐Ensemble Algorithms

S. Thiyagarajan, Dhowmya Bhatt, Fethi Aloui, Ankit Sonthalia, Edwin Geo Varuvel, Femilda Josephin J.S.
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion cells have become an important part of our daily lives. They are used to power mobile phones, laptops and more recently electric vehicles (both two‐ and four‐wheelers). The chemical behavior of the cells is rather complex and non‐linear. For reliable and sustainable use of the cells for practical applications, it is imperative to predict the precise pace at which their capacity will degrade. More importantly, the lifetime of the cells must be predicted at an early stage, which would accelerate development and design optimization of the cells. However, most of the existing methods cannot predict the lifetime at an early stage, since there is a weak correlation between the cell capacity and lifetime. In this study for accurate forecasting of the battery lifetime, the patterns of the parameters such as cell current, voltage, temperature, charging time, internal resistance, and capacity were examined during charging and discharging cycle of the cell. Twelve manually crafted features were prepared from these parameters. The dataset for the features was created using the raw data of the first 100 cycles of 124 cells. Six ensemble and non‐ensemble machine learning algorithms, namely, multiple linear regression (MLR), decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were trained with the features for predicting the life‐cycle of the cells. The R 2 and root mean squared error (RMSE) values of MLR, decision tree, SVM, GBM, LGBM, and XGBoost were found to be 0.72 and 201, 0.83 and 155, 0.85 and 146, 0.92 and 100, 0.9 and 112, and 0.94 and 95, respectively. The prediction accuracy of lithium‐ion cell life‐time was found to be the best with the XGBoost algorithm. This shows that only first 100 cycles are required foraccurately predicting the number of cycles the lithium‐ion cell can work for. Lastly, the results of the study were compared with the available studies in the literature. Three studies were chosen, and the RMSE of the method proposed in this study was found to be higher than the three studies by 43, 17, and 20. Therefore, the proposed method is a suitable option for predicting the lifetime of lithium‐ion cells during the early stages of its development.

Energy StorageVol. 7(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Laboratoire d'Automatique, de Mécanique et d'Informatique Industrielles et Humaines (FR), Istinye University (TR), Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France (FR), Saveetha University (IN)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.