A Comparative Legal Study of Commissioner and Shareholder Authority over Director Negligence Case: Indonesia vs. Singapore

In terms of conducting business interactions through a PT, it is not uncommon for investors from Indonesia and Singapore to experience disharmony in practice, such as negligence by the board of directors that results in harm to the company. Therefore, it is important to have an effective legal mechanism to challenge such negligence so there is an urgency to identify and understand the differences between the legal framework in Indonesia and Singapore in dealing with directors' negligence is important for stakeholders to adopt best practices and improve corporate governance. The results show that derivative rights in Singapore provide a more effective and efficient tool for shareholders to challenge directors' negligence, with clearer legal procedures and stronger legal protections compared to Indonesia. The study concludes that the adoption of best practices from Singapore can improve corporate accountability and governance in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37253/jlpt.v9i2.9813
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Legal Study of Commissioner and Shareholder Authority over Director Negligence Case: Indonesia vs. Singapore

Triana Dewi Seroja, Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk, Putri Saphira Audesti Binti Yussofi
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

A Comparative Legal Study of Commissioner and Shareholder Authority over Director Negligence Case: Indonesia vs. Singapore

Triana Dewi Seroja, Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk, Putri Saphira Audesti Binti Yussofi
article en

Abstract

In terms of conducting business interactions through a PT, it is not uncommon for investors from Indonesia and Singapore to experience disharmony in practice, such as negligence by the board of directors that results in harm to the company. Therefore, it is important to have an effective legal mechanism to challenge such negligence so there is an urgency to identify and understand the differences between the legal framework in Indonesia and Singapore in dealing with directors' negligence is important for stakeholders to adopt best practices and improve corporate governance. The results show that derivative rights in Singapore provide a more effective and efficient tool for shareholders to challenge directors' negligence, with clearer legal procedures and stronger legal protections compared to Indonesia. The study concludes that the adoption of best practices from Singapore can improve corporate accountability and governance in Indonesia.

Journal of Law and Policy TransformationVol. 9(2)
International University of Batam (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.