A comparative study on material removal rate and surface roughness during electrochemical machining of 100Cr6 steel in oxidizing and reducing electrolytic environments

Electrochemical machining is a promising technique for creating microtextured surfaces on engineering materials due to its advantages, including a high material removal rate and superior surface finish. Electrochemical machining, however, faces challenges that hinder its precision, primarily due to the formation of a passive oxide layer on the workpiece surface. This oxide layer negatively affects both material removal rate and surface roughness (Ra), complicating the machining process. High current densities (> 20 A/cm²) can improve material removal rate, but they also increase energy consumption and worsen surface finish quality due to the intensified oxide layer formation. This dynamic creates a trade-off between increased material removal and a deteriorated surface finish. The article investigates ways to overcome these limitations by selecting appropriate electrolytic environments for the process. The study focuses on the anodic dissolution behavior of 100Cr6 steel in two distinct electrolytic solutions. The first is an oxidizing electrolyte, consisting of potassium dichromate (K 2 Cr 2 O 7 ) and sodium chloride (NaCl), which promotes oxidation. The second is a reducing electrolyte, containing copper sulfate (CuSO 4 ) and NaCl, which affects the electrochemical dissolution process differently by reducing the steel surface. The maximum improvement in material removal rate with the oxidizing electrolyte is observed at 22%, but simultaneously, a reduction in surface finish quality by 16.4% is noted. The reducing electrolyte offers much better overall performance, with significant improvements in both material removal rate (48.5%) and surface finish quality (21.7%). This is attributed to the reduction in oxide layer formation, which allows for a more controlled and efficient machining process. Analytical techniques like cyclic voltammetry (CV), UV–visible spectrophotometry, and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) were employed to analyze the dissolution process and visualize surface changes after machining. The results show that the oxidizing environment exposes more metal surfaces than the reducing environment, which aids in understanding and optimizing electrochemical machining processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089251316751
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study on material removal rate and surface roughness during electrochemical machining of 100Cr6 steel in oxidizing and reducing electrolytic environments

Ritesh Kumar Upadhyay, Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, Narendra Singh Yadav, Shyam Sundar Majhi et al.
3 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
2.19
article

A comparative study on material removal rate and surface roughness during electrochemical machining of 100Cr6 steel in oxidizing and reducing electrolytic environments

Ritesh Kumar Upadhyay, Ashis Kumar Chakraborty, Narendra Singh Yadav, Shyam Sundar Majhi, Susanta Sinha Mahapatra, Anjali Singh, Bishnu Kumar
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Electrochemical machining is a promising technique for creating microtextured surfaces on engineering materials due to its advantages, including a high material removal rate and superior surface finish. Electrochemical machining, however, faces challenges that hinder its precision, primarily due to the formation of a passive oxide layer on the workpiece surface. This oxide layer negatively affects both material removal rate and surface roughness (Ra), complicating the machining process. High current densities (> 20 A/cm²) can improve material removal rate, but they also increase energy consumption and worsen surface finish quality due to the intensified oxide layer formation. This dynamic creates a trade-off between increased material removal and a deteriorated surface finish. The article investigates ways to overcome these limitations by selecting appropriate electrolytic environments for the process. The study focuses on the anodic dissolution behavior of 100Cr6 steel in two distinct electrolytic solutions. The first is an oxidizing electrolyte, consisting of potassium dichromate (K 2 Cr 2 O 7 ) and sodium chloride (NaCl), which promotes oxidation. The second is a reducing electrolyte, containing copper sulfate (CuSO 4 ) and NaCl, which affects the electrochemical dissolution process differently by reducing the steel surface. The maximum improvement in material removal rate with the oxidizing electrolyte is observed at 22%, but simultaneously, a reduction in surface finish quality by 16.4% is noted. The reducing electrolyte offers much better overall performance, with significant improvements in both material removal rate (48.5%) and surface finish quality (21.7%). This is attributed to the reduction in oxide layer formation, which allows for a more controlled and efficient machining process. Analytical techniques like cyclic voltammetry (CV), UV–visible spectrophotometry, and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) were employed to analyze the dissolution process and visualize surface changes after machining. The results show that the oxidizing environment exposes more metal surfaces than the reducing environment, which aids in understanding and optimizing electrochemical machining processes.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.