Governing Dual-Use Research of Concern in the Life Sciences: United States and Canada Policy Comparative Analysis and Recommendations
While both countries maintain robust DURC oversight frameworks, they differ in their approach to governance, scope, and implementation. Based on this analysis, five key recommendations were developed. This includes establishing an international minimum standard for DURC regulation, extending U.S. DURC legislation to non-federally funded research, developing detailed risk-benefit analysis guidelines, and strengthening policies for responsible scientific communication.
Authors
- Riya Manas Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8117-0879)
- Yasmin Cürük
- Kirke Joamets
- Kurdo Araz
- Conrad Kunadu
Institutions
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Applied Biosafety
- Published
- 2025-02-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2024.0046
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Science, Research, and Medicine
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.70