Clonal dynamics of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia progression: paired‐sample comparison

This study investigated the clonal evolution of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) by next-generation sequencing and pyrosequencing for variant allele frequency (VAF) of gene mutations and SNP microarray for copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in 38 paired samples from CMML/sAML patients of Taiwanese origin. The median interval between CMML and sAML samples collection was 14.9 months (1.0-89.6). RUNX1 (57%), TET2 (46%), SRSF2 (37%), and ASXL1 (28%) mutations were frequent at CMML diagnosis. Baseline VAF in epigenetic regulator genes was high (>35%) in 83% of mutational events at the CMML phase, remained stable in 78% (VAF changes <10%), and increased in 20% (increased VAF > 10%) during progression to sAML. Transcription factor genes showed high VAF (>35%) in 51% at the CMML phase, and stable VAF in 60% during progression. VAF of spliceosome genes was high (>35%) in 70% at CMML phase, and stable in 61% during progression. Activated signaling genes exhibited acquisition or loss during progression. TET2 mutations were often founding clones, and SRSF2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, or spliceosome genes also acted as ancestral mutations. RUNX1 mutations were typically later events and occasionally ancestral hits or germline mutations. Acquisition of cytogenetic changes, signaling pathways genes (PTPN11, FLT3, NRAS, CBL), or AML-defined genes (NPM1, CEBPA, CBFB::MYH11) by linear or branching evolution occurred during sAML progression. CN-LOH was noted in EZH2, CBL, TET2, and DNMT3A genes. CEBPA mutation and concurrent biallelic TET2 with NRAS mutations at CMML diagnosis were risk factors for time to AML progression and overall survival. A characteristic ASXL1<sup>MT</sup>/RUNX1<sup>MT</sup>/Spliceosome<sup>MT</sup>/signaling<sup>WT</sup> genetic profile was associated with monocyte counts of 0.5-1.0 × 10<sup>9</sup>/l. This study highlights the complexity and heterogeneity of dynamic changes in clonal architecture during CMML progression, emphasizing its importance in pathogenesis, phenotype, risk stratification, and therapeutic strategy. © 2025 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Pathology
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/path.6396
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clonal dynamics of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia progression: paired‐sample comparison

Ming‐Chung Kuo, Hsiao‐Wen Kao, Lee‐Yung Shih, Tung‐Liang Lin et al.
2 citations
The Journal of Pathology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
3.54
article

Clonal dynamics of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia progression: paired‐sample comparison

Ming‐Chung Kuo, Hsiao‐Wen Kao, Lee‐Yung Shih, Tung‐Liang Lin, Ting‐Yu Huang, Yu‐Shin Hung, Hung Chang, C.‐Y. Ou, Jin‐Hou Wu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the clonal evolution of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) by next-generation sequencing and pyrosequencing for variant allele frequency (VAF) of gene mutations and SNP microarray for copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) in 38 paired samples from CMML/sAML patients of Taiwanese origin. The median interval between CMML and sAML samples collection was 14.9 months (1.0-89.6). RUNX1 (57%), TET2 (46%), SRSF2 (37%), and ASXL1 (28%) mutations were frequent at CMML diagnosis. Baseline VAF in epigenetic regulator genes was high (>35%) in 83% of mutational events at the CMML phase, remained stable in 78% (VAF changes <10%), and increased in 20% (increased VAF > 10%) during progression to sAML. Transcription factor genes showed high VAF (>35%) in 51% at the CMML phase, and stable VAF in 60% during progression. VAF of spliceosome genes was high (>35%) in 70% at CMML phase, and stable in 61% during progression. Activated signaling genes exhibited acquisition or loss during progression. TET2 mutations were often founding clones, and SRSF2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2, or spliceosome genes also acted as ancestral mutations. RUNX1 mutations were typically later events and occasionally ancestral hits or germline mutations. Acquisition of cytogenetic changes, signaling pathways genes (PTPN11, FLT3, NRAS, CBL), or AML-defined genes (NPM1, CEBPA, CBFB::MYH11) by linear or branching evolution occurred during sAML progression. CN-LOH was noted in EZH2, CBL, TET2, and DNMT3A genes. CEBPA mutation and concurrent biallelic TET2 with NRAS mutations at CMML diagnosis were risk factors for time to AML progression and overall survival. A characteristic ASXL1<sup>MT</sup>/RUNX1<sup>MT</sup>/Spliceosome<sup>MT</sup>/signaling<sup>WT</sup> genetic profile was associated with monocyte counts of 0.5-1.0 × 10<sup>9</sup>/l. This study highlights the complexity and heterogeneity of dynamic changes in clonal architecture during CMML progression, emphasizing its importance in pathogenesis, phenotype, risk stratification, and therapeutic strategy. © 2025 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

The Journal of PathologyVol. 265(4)
Chang Gung University (TW), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, National Health Research Institutes
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
3.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.