LEGAL ASPECTS OF USING ANTI-OSINT AS A TOOL TO PROTECT INTERNET USERS AGAINST IDENTITY THEFT
Today, there is a need to coordinate generally accepted standards for the use of open source intelligence (hereinafter - OSINT), as this is becoming relevant in the context of user protection. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the legal basis for the use of anti-OSINT as a tool to protect Internet users from identity theft. To achieve this goal, a variety of scientific and legal methods were used, including analysis and synthesis, formal logical and formal legal methods, as well as the comparative legal method. The author analyses various approaches to understanding the acquisition of intelligence information from open sources, as well as modern sources of its legal regulation. The author suggests that OSINT should be defined under legal control as a system of legal means, methods, forms and ways which ensure that OSINT actors operate with due regard to the needs and avoid threats. It is determined that the legal regulation of OSINT is aimed at organising public relations in this area, creating an appropriate system of legal means, methods and conditions for OSINT activities. It is proposed to adopt a single international global legal act in the area of personal data protection. The author emphasises the need to establish an effective research data management policy. In addition to cybersecurity standards, organisational measures should also be implemented to avoid unauthorised access to databases. The paper formulates and substantiates recommendations that can be used to improve OSINT legislation. These proposals may be useful for the international community and Internet users in particular.
Authors
- Marcin Konieczny (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-1509)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
- Published
- 2024-12-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9821
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.78