How Do Climate‐Related Risks and Opportunities Affect Portfolio Allocation and Asset Pricing?

ABSTRACT This paper examines the performance of “clean,” “brown,” and “dirty” stocks in the S&P 500 from January 2010 to September 2022 using panel random effect estimation and factor models. It also uses cointegration analysis to assess the long‐term relationship between risk premiums and two carbon risk factors: “brown minus clean” and “dirty minus clean.” Finally, we use random walk tests to examine whether carbon risks are priced, and therefore, the S&P 500 market is weakly efficient. Findings indicate that the brown portfolio outperforms the clean portfolio in factor models, likely due to market trends where energy, driven by rising oil and gas prices, outperforms all other sectors. The results also show that the two carbon risks and the political risk have a negative and significant impact on the risk premium and that the excess return series do not follow random walks and are weak form inefficient.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial and Decision Economics
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4494
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Climate‐Related Risks and Opportunities Affect Portfolio Allocation and Asset Pricing?

Xiaoni Li, Maher Asal, Yin Shi
2 citations
Managerial and Decision Economics
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
4.42
article

How Do Climate‐Related Risks and Opportunities Affect Portfolio Allocation and Asset Pricing?

Xiaoni Li, Maher Asal, Yin Shi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the performance of “clean,” “brown,” and “dirty” stocks in the S&P 500 from January 2010 to September 2022 using panel random effect estimation and factor models. It also uses cointegration analysis to assess the long‐term relationship between risk premiums and two carbon risk factors: “brown minus clean” and “dirty minus clean.” Finally, we use random walk tests to examine whether carbon risks are priced, and therefore, the S&P 500 market is weakly efficient. Findings indicate that the brown portfolio outperforms the clean portfolio in factor models, likely due to market trends where energy, driven by rising oil and gas prices, outperforms all other sectors. The results also show that the two carbon risks and the political risk have a negative and significant impact on the risk premium and that the excess return series do not follow random walks and are weak form inefficient.

Managerial and Decision EconomicsVol. 46(5)
University West (SE), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.