AMENDMENT TO THE PRINCIPLE OF DEEPENING TRUST (ART. 8 K.P.A.) – COMMENTS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF COURT DECISIONS

Art. 8 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, which introduces a general principle of administrative proceedings - the principle of deepening trust, was amended in 2017. The legislator decided to introduce several new elements to this regulation. The analysis of the literature leads to the conclusion that the amendment reflects the previously formulated postulates of the doctrine of administrative procedure. Over the course of several years of functioning of these legal solutions, court decisions have expressed many views. The authors analyze and discuss both the changes introduced and the above-mentioned views of the judicature from the perspective of the protective function of Art. 8 k.p.a. The research conducted leads to the conclusion that some requirements addressed by administrative courts significantly limit the implementation of this provision, including the protective function derived from it. The authors propose that requirements that distance practice from these undesirable effects should be rejected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9855
Primary Topic
Legal principles and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AMENDMENT TO THE PRINCIPLE OF DEEPENING TRUST (ART. 8 K.P.A.) – COMMENTS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF COURT DECISIONS

Patrycja Majewska, Kamil Majewski
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
Legal principles and applications
article

AMENDMENT TO THE PRINCIPLE OF DEEPENING TRUST (ART. 8 K.P.A.) – COMMENTS AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF COURT DECISIONS

Patrycja Majewska, Kamil Majewski
article en

Abstract

Art. 8 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, which introduces a general principle of administrative proceedings - the principle of deepening trust, was amended in 2017. The legislator decided to introduce several new elements to this regulation. The analysis of the literature leads to the conclusion that the amendment reflects the previously formulated postulates of the doctrine of administrative procedure. Over the course of several years of functioning of these legal solutions, court decisions have expressed many views. The authors analyze and discuss both the changes introduced and the above-mentioned views of the judicature from the perspective of the protective function of Art. 8 k.p.a. The research conducted leads to the conclusion that some requirements addressed by administrative courts significantly limit the implementation of this provision, including the protective function derived from it. The authors propose that requirements that distance practice from these undesirable effects should be rejected.

Roczniki Administracji i PrawaVol. 4(XXIV)
University of Economics in Katowice (PL), Humanitas (United States) (US), University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Legal principles and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.