MEANS OF EVIDENCE OF AN UNNAMED NATURE IN THE LIGHT OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS

An administrative proceeding is a sequence of actions taken by a public administration body to establish the facts of a case and to subsequently issue an administrative decision based on all available and verified facts and evidence. For the authority to issue a decision in a case, it is necessary to conduct a thorough investigation based on the evidence, which is listed in Article 75 of the Act of June 14, 1960, Code of Administrative Procedure, that is, in particular, documents, witness testimony, expert opinions and inspection. However, this is not a closed catalog, as the authority is also authorized to conduct other evidence, called unnamed. The catalog of this evidence is very broad, and this group can include virtually anything that can contribute to the clarification of the case and is not contrary to the law. The purpose of this article is to show the peculiarities of unnamed evidence and how it can be used in an administrative investigation taking into account examples from the case law of administrative courts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9857
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MEANS OF EVIDENCE OF AN UNNAMED NATURE IN THE LIGHT OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS

Ewa Kubas
Roczniki Administracji i Prawa
European and International Law Studies
article

MEANS OF EVIDENCE OF AN UNNAMED NATURE IN THE LIGHT OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS

Ewa Kubas
article en

Abstract

An administrative proceeding is a sequence of actions taken by a public administration body to establish the facts of a case and to subsequently issue an administrative decision based on all available and verified facts and evidence. For the authority to issue a decision in a case, it is necessary to conduct a thorough investigation based on the evidence, which is listed in Article 75 of the Act of June 14, 1960, Code of Administrative Procedure, that is, in particular, documents, witness testimony, expert opinions and inspection. However, this is not a closed catalog, as the authority is also authorized to conduct other evidence, called unnamed. The catalog of this evidence is very broad, and this group can include virtually anything that can contribute to the clarification of the case and is not contrary to the law. The purpose of this article is to show the peculiarities of unnamed evidence and how it can be used in an administrative investigation taking into account examples from the case law of administrative courts.

Roczniki Administracji i PrawaVol. 4(XXIV)
University of Rzeszów (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

MEANS OF EVIDENCE OF AN UNNAMED NATURE IN THE LIGHT OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS — Ewa Kubas · Roczniki Administracji i Prawa (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS