A long road to educational equity: Tracking trends through PISA 2000–2018

• This study analyses data from the 2000 to 2018 PISA rounds, offering an overview of educational socioeconomic-related equity trends across 87 countries, comprising 37 OECD members and 50 partner countries and offering insights into the dynamics of equity levels, the stability of these trends, and the consistency of the changes. • Significant differences exist in the impact of socioeconomic background on educational outcomes across countries. From 2000 to 2018, equity has slightly improved across the countries, although improvements are often inconsistent or statistically insignificant. • The study highlights the diversity of national pathways to equity. Countries with low initial equity have made significant progress, while some with higher equity levels struggle to advance. No clear pattern exists between equity levels and the extent of change. Positive changes in equity have occurred in various economic, regional, and cultural contexts, suggesting the potential for all countries to improve. The OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has reported on the levels of educational equity in participating countries since its inception in 2000. However, little attention has been paid to changes in equity levels over time. This study analyses data from the 2000 to 2018 PISA rounds, offering an overview of educational socioeconomic-related equity — specifically equality of opportunity (assessed through the relationship between R-squared and ESCS) — trends across 87 countries, comprising 37 OECD members and 50 partner countries. It provides insights into the dynamics of equity levels at the country level, the stability of these trends, and the consistency of the changes. By using all available PISA waves for each participating country, calculating an average R-squared between subjects (Reading, Math and Science), and combining the “absolute” position in the equity indicator with the change over time in that same indicator, this study presents the first comprehensive picture of the evolution of equality of opportunities (assessed through the R-squared indicator) in all PISA-participating countries. Results show that, on average, PISA-participating countries have only slightly improved their equality of opportunity. Additionally, there is an absence of clear patterns regarding the relationship between equity levels and equity change, highlighting the diversity of national pathways to equity and underscoring the importance of analysing specific contexts when assessing equity. Lastly, this study also helps to identify successful country cases that have demonstrated more solid and coherent positive trends in improving educational equity over the last two decades.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Research Open
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100445
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A long road to educational equity: Tracking trends through PISA 2000–2018

Cibelle Toledo, Gil Nata, Tiago Neves, Ekaterina Enchikova
5 citations
International Journal of Educational Research Open
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
42.61
article

A long road to educational equity: Tracking trends through PISA 2000–2018

Cibelle Toledo, Gil Nata, Tiago Neves, Ekaterina Enchikova
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• This study analyses data from the 2000 to 2018 PISA rounds, offering an overview of educational socioeconomic-related equity trends across 87 countries, comprising 37 OECD members and 50 partner countries and offering insights into the dynamics of equity levels, the stability of these trends, and the consistency of the changes. • Significant differences exist in the impact of socioeconomic background on educational outcomes across countries. From 2000 to 2018, equity has slightly improved across the countries, although improvements are often inconsistent or statistically insignificant. • The study highlights the diversity of national pathways to equity. Countries with low initial equity have made significant progress, while some with higher equity levels struggle to advance. No clear pattern exists between equity levels and the extent of change. Positive changes in equity have occurred in various economic, regional, and cultural contexts, suggesting the potential for all countries to improve. The OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) has reported on the levels of educational equity in participating countries since its inception in 2000. However, little attention has been paid to changes in equity levels over time. This study analyses data from the 2000 to 2018 PISA rounds, offering an overview of educational socioeconomic-related equity — specifically equality of opportunity (assessed through the relationship between R-squared and ESCS) — trends across 87 countries, comprising 37 OECD members and 50 partner countries. It provides insights into the dynamics of equity levels at the country level, the stability of these trends, and the consistency of the changes. By using all available PISA waves for each participating country, calculating an average R-squared between subjects (Reading, Math and Science), and combining the “absolute” position in the equity indicator with the change over time in that same indicator, this study presents the first comprehensive picture of the evolution of equality of opportunities (assessed through the R-squared indicator) in all PISA-participating countries. Results show that, on average, PISA-participating countries have only slightly improved their equality of opportunity. Additionally, there is an absence of clear patterns regarding the relationship between equity levels and equity change, highlighting the diversity of national pathways to equity and underscoring the importance of analysing specific contexts when assessing equity. Lastly, this study also helps to identify successful country cases that have demonstrated more solid and coherent positive trends in improving educational equity over the last two decades.

International Journal of Educational Research OpenVol. 8
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
42.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.