Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform the way research is conducted, particularly through generative AI (GenAI) tools which can enhance written communication and foster innovation via knowledge development. This study focuses on the latter, examining the role of GenAI in specific knowledge development activities within literature reviews. Through an epistemological lens, we distinguish six key knowledge development activities: research synthesis, evidence aggregation, critique, theory building, research gap identification, and research agenda development. Our analysis demonstrates both the capabilities and limitations of GenAI in supporting these activities, highlighting how GenAI can assist in synthesizing previous work, discovering and integrating concepts, and advancing various knowledge domains. We emphasize a human-centered, synergistic approach where GenAI complements researchers’ efforts, rather than replacing them. Additionally, our activity-centric analysis provides insights into how different types of literature reviews can effectively benefit from GenAI support, thereby contributing to a broader understanding of AI integration in information systems research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Markets
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00754-2
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development

Mauricio Marrone, Guido Schryen, Jiaqi Yang
18 citations
Electronic Markets
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
42.58
article

Exploring the scope of generative AI in literature review development

Mauricio Marrone, Guido Schryen, Jiaqi Yang
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform the way research is conducted, particularly through generative AI (GenAI) tools which can enhance written communication and foster innovation via knowledge development. This study focuses on the latter, examining the role of GenAI in specific knowledge development activities within literature reviews. Through an epistemological lens, we distinguish six key knowledge development activities: research synthesis, evidence aggregation, critique, theory building, research gap identification, and research agenda development. Our analysis demonstrates both the capabilities and limitations of GenAI in supporting these activities, highlighting how GenAI can assist in synthesizing previous work, discovering and integrating concepts, and advancing various knowledge domains. We emphasize a human-centered, synergistic approach where GenAI complements researchers’ efforts, rather than replacing them. Additionally, our activity-centric analysis provides insights into how different types of literature reviews can effectively benefit from GenAI support, thereby contributing to a broader understanding of AI integration in information systems research.

Electronic MarketsVol. 35(1)
Paderborn University (DE), UNSW Sydney (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Universität Paderborn
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
42.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.