Utility of immunohistochemistry for immunoglobulin G4 in the diagnosis of pemphigus

Objectives: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is the diagnostic gold standard for pemphigus. However, it is limited by the requirement of additional fresh-frozen tissue, immediate processing, and availability of a fluorescent microscope. The present study aims to assess the role of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) immunohistochemistry (IHC) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for the diagnosis of pemphigus by comparing IgG4-IHC results to DIF. Materials and Methods: IgG4-IHC was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of lesional and perilesional skin biopsies of 30 cases of DIF-proven pemphigus and 30 non-pemphigus controls. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were analyzed for IgG4-IHC on lesional and perilesional biopsies to compare their diagnostic significance. Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 29. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of IgG4-IHC were calculated using standard formulae. Receiver operator curve analysis was performed for IgG4-IHC in lesional and perilesional skin to compare their diagnostic significance. The youden index was calculated using the formula “sensitivity + specificity – 1.” P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 30 cases enrolled for the study, 26 (86.6%) were diagnosed as pemphigus vulgaris and four (13.4%) as pemphigus foliaceous. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of IgG4-IHC for pemphigus on lesional biopsy were 66.7%, 100%, 100%, 75%, and 83.3% while the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy for the perilesional biopsy were 56.7%, 100%, 69.8%, and 78.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Our study indicated that IgG4-IHC is highly specific, but not sufficiently sensitive to replace DIF to diagnose pemphigus. IgG4-IHC on lesional skin is likely to be particularly valuable in a setting where a frozen section or immunofluorescence facility is not available. Further studies on larger samples are warranted to validate the role of IgG4-IHC in pemphigus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jlp_96_2024
Primary Topic
Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of immunohistochemistry for immunoglobulin G4 in the diagnosis of pemphigus

Bhavani Krishnamurthy, Shameera Begum, Sowmya Srinivasan
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
article

Utility of immunohistochemistry for immunoglobulin G4 in the diagnosis of pemphigus

Bhavani Krishnamurthy, Shameera Begum, Sowmya Srinivasan
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is the diagnostic gold standard for pemphigus. However, it is limited by the requirement of additional fresh-frozen tissue, immediate processing, and availability of a fluorescent microscope. The present study aims to assess the role of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) immunohistochemistry (IHC) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue for the diagnosis of pemphigus by comparing IgG4-IHC results to DIF. Materials and Methods: IgG4-IHC was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of lesional and perilesional skin biopsies of 30 cases of DIF-proven pemphigus and 30 non-pemphigus controls. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy were analyzed for IgG4-IHC on lesional and perilesional biopsies to compare their diagnostic significance. Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 29. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of IgG4-IHC were calculated using standard formulae. Receiver operator curve analysis was performed for IgG4-IHC in lesional and perilesional skin to compare their diagnostic significance. The youden index was calculated using the formula “sensitivity + specificity – 1.” P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 30 cases enrolled for the study, 26 (86.6%) were diagnosed as pemphigus vulgaris and four (13.4%) as pemphigus foliaceous. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of IgG4-IHC for pemphigus on lesional biopsy were 66.7%, 100%, 100%, 75%, and 83.3% while the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy for the perilesional biopsy were 56.7%, 100%, 69.8%, and 78.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Our study indicated that IgG4-IHC is highly specific, but not sufficiently sensitive to replace DIF to diagnose pemphigus. IgG4-IHC on lesional skin is likely to be particularly valuable in a setting where a frozen section or immunofluorescence facility is not available. Further studies on larger samples are warranted to validate the role of IgG4-IHC in pemphigus.

Journal of Laboratory PhysiciansVol. 17
Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.