Effects of public expenditure for agriculture on food security in Africa

Abstract The commitments of Malabo provide for African countries to devote at least ten percent of their public expenditure to agriculture, with the aim of ending hunger by 2025, in line with the Agenda 2063. While evidence on welfare effects of public expenditure for agriculture is huge, this particular indicator, i.e., the percentage of public expenditure devoted to agriculture, was only recently considered by empirical literature. Based on panel data from African countries between 2002 and 2019 and IV approach to address reverse causality, the study finds significant effect of the Malabo indicator on food security, particularly when allocation of budget to agriculture is coupled with good governance. Through in-sample estimates, the study also finds that the target of ten percent is reasonable, because it roughly corresponds to zero hunger. Finally, an analysis of the transmission mechanisms between public expenditure for agriculture and food security is performed and it confirms the role of growth and agricultural intensification in this relationship but questions its centrality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical Economics
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-025-02713-4
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.56

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of public expenditure for agriculture on food security in Africa

Marta Marson
3 citations
Empirical Economics
Agricultural risk and resilience
3.56
article

Effects of public expenditure for agriculture on food security in Africa

Marta Marson
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The commitments of Malabo provide for African countries to devote at least ten percent of their public expenditure to agriculture, with the aim of ending hunger by 2025, in line with the Agenda 2063. While evidence on welfare effects of public expenditure for agriculture is huge, this particular indicator, i.e., the percentage of public expenditure devoted to agriculture, was only recently considered by empirical literature. Based on panel data from African countries between 2002 and 2019 and IV approach to address reverse causality, the study finds significant effect of the Malabo indicator on food security, particularly when allocation of budget to agriculture is coupled with good governance. Through in-sample estimates, the study also finds that the target of ten percent is reasonable, because it roughly corresponds to zero hunger. Finally, an analysis of the transmission mechanisms between public expenditure for agriculture and food security is performed and it confirms the role of growth and agricultural intensification in this relationship but questions its centrality.

Empirical EconomicsVol. 68(6)
Collegio Carlo Alberto (IT), University of Milan (IT)
Politecnico di Milano
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agricultural risk and resilience
3.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of public expenditure for agriculture on food security in Africa — Marta Marson · Empirical Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS