An Audience Heterogeneity View of Markets: Contributions, Tensions, and Agenda for Future Research

Producers’ resource allocation, performance, and survival depend on how market audiences identify, evaluate, and value them. While research has focused on producers’ heterogeneity, it has not consistently addressed audiences’ heterogeneity despite its critical consequences on producers’ decisions and market dynamics. This review integrates three research perspectives—ecological, socio-cognitive, and optimal distinctiveness—to offer a clearer comprehension of audience heterogeneity. It distinguishes between-audience heterogeneity from within-audience heterogeneity and regroups existing but scattered findings under two audience heterogeneity dimensions: audience plasticity and audience multiplexity. Avenues for research build on these distinctions and underscore the relationships between audience heterogeneity and market temporality, individual reactions (e.g., rooted in ideology and emotions), and technology (in particular AI-enhanced categorization).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241312658
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Audience Heterogeneity View of Markets: Contributions, Tensions, and Agenda for Future Research

Rodolphe Durand, Tomi Laamanen, Kata Isenring
2 citations
Journal of Management
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
12.35
article

An Audience Heterogeneity View of Markets: Contributions, Tensions, and Agenda for Future Research

Rodolphe Durand, Tomi Laamanen, Kata Isenring
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Producers’ resource allocation, performance, and survival depend on how market audiences identify, evaluate, and value them. While research has focused on producers’ heterogeneity, it has not consistently addressed audiences’ heterogeneity despite its critical consequences on producers’ decisions and market dynamics. This review integrates three research perspectives—ecological, socio-cognitive, and optimal distinctiveness—to offer a clearer comprehension of audience heterogeneity. It distinguishes between-audience heterogeneity from within-audience heterogeneity and regroups existing but scattered findings under two audience heterogeneity dimensions: audience plasticity and audience multiplexity. Avenues for research build on these distinctions and underscore the relationships between audience heterogeneity and market temporality, individual reactions (e.g., rooted in ideology and emotions), and technology (in particular AI-enhanced categorization).

Journal of ManagementVol. 51(6)
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
12.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.