Tailoring explanations through conversation

Abstract The increasing applications of AI systems require personalized explanations for their behaviors to various stakeholders since the stakeholders may have various backgrounds. In general, a conversation between explainers and explainees not only allows explainers to obtain explainees’ background, but also allows explainers to tailor their explanations so that explainees can better understand the explanations. In this paper, we propose an approach for an explainer to tailor and communicate personalized explanations to an explainee through having consecutive conversations with the explainee. We prove that the conversation terminates due to the explainee’s justification of the initial claim as long as there exists an explanation for the initial claim that the explainee understands and the explainer is aware of.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Logic and Computation
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exaf008
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tailoring explanations through conversation

Jieting Luo, Mehdi Dastani, Thomas Studer
Journal of Logic and Computation
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Tailoring explanations through conversation

Jieting Luo, Mehdi Dastani, Thomas Studer
article en

Abstract

Abstract The increasing applications of AI systems require personalized explanations for their behaviors to various stakeholders since the stakeholders may have various backgrounds. In general, a conversation between explainers and explainees not only allows explainers to obtain explainees’ background, but also allows explainers to tailor their explanations so that explainees can better understand the explanations. In this paper, we propose an approach for an explainer to tailor and communicate personalized explanations to an explainee through having consecutive conversations with the explainee. We prove that the conversation terminates due to the explainee’s justification of the initial claim as long as there exists an explanation for the initial claim that the explainee understands and the explainer is aware of.

Journal of Logic and ComputationVol. 35(4)
University of Bern (CH), Utrecht University (NL), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science (CZ), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.