Physics-Informed Autoencoder for Prostate Tissue Microstructure Profiling with Hybrid Multidimensional MRI

Purpose To evaluate the performance of Physics-Informed Autoencoder (PIA), a self-supervised deep learning model, in measuring tissue-based biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa) using hybrid multidimensional MRI. Materials and Methods This retrospective study introduces PIA, an emerging self-supervised deep learning model that integrates a three-compartment diffusion-relaxation model with hybrid multidimensional MRI. PIA was trained to encode the biophysical model into a deep neural network to predict measurements of tissue-specific biomarkers for PCa without extensive training data requirements. Comprehensive in silico and in vivo experiments, using histopathology measurements as the reference standard, were conducted to validate the model's efficacy in comparison to the traditional nonlinear least squares (NLLS) algorithm. PIA's robustness to noise was tested in in silico experiments with varying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, and in vivo performance for estimating volume fractions was evaluated in 21 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 6.6 [SD]; all male) with PCa (71 regions of interest). Evaluation metrics included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results PIA predicted the reference standard tissue parameters with high accuracy, outperforming conventional NLLS methods, especially under noisy conditions (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.80 vs 0.65, <i>P</i> < .001 for epithelium volume at SNR of 20:1). In in vivo validation, PIA's noninvasive volume fraction estimates matched quantitative histology (ICC, 0.94, 0.85, and 0.92 for epithelium, stroma, and lumen compartments, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001 for all). PIA's measurements strongly correlated with PCa aggressiveness (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>P</i> < .001). Furthermore, PIA ran 10 000 faster than NLLS (0.18 second vs 40 minutes per image). Conclusion PIA provided accurate prostate tissue biomarker measurements from MRI data with better robustness to noise and computational efficiency compared with the NLLS algorithm. The results demonstrate the potential of PIA as an accurate, noninvasive, and explainable artificial intelligence method for PCa detection. <b>Keywords:</b> Prostate, Stacked Auto-Encoders, Tissue Characterization, MR-Diffusion-weighted Imaging <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> ©RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Adams and Bressem in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240167
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-Informed Autoencoder for Prostate Tissue Microstructure Profiling with Hybrid Multidimensional MRI

Batuhan Gündoğdu, Aytekin Oto, Aritrick Chatterjee, Ulaş Bağcı et al.
1 citations
Radiology Artificial Intelligence
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
1.36
article

Physics-Informed Autoencoder for Prostate Tissue Microstructure Profiling with Hybrid Multidimensional MRI

Batuhan Gündoğdu, Aytekin Oto, Aritrick Chatterjee, Ulaş Bağcı, Milica Medved, Gregory S. Karczmar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the performance of Physics-Informed Autoencoder (PIA), a self-supervised deep learning model, in measuring tissue-based biomarkers for prostate cancer (PCa) using hybrid multidimensional MRI. Materials and Methods This retrospective study introduces PIA, an emerging self-supervised deep learning model that integrates a three-compartment diffusion-relaxation model with hybrid multidimensional MRI. PIA was trained to encode the biophysical model into a deep neural network to predict measurements of tissue-specific biomarkers for PCa without extensive training data requirements. Comprehensive in silico and in vivo experiments, using histopathology measurements as the reference standard, were conducted to validate the model's efficacy in comparison to the traditional nonlinear least squares (NLLS) algorithm. PIA's robustness to noise was tested in in silico experiments with varying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, and in vivo performance for estimating volume fractions was evaluated in 21 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 6.6 [SD]; all male) with PCa (71 regions of interest). Evaluation metrics included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results PIA predicted the reference standard tissue parameters with high accuracy, outperforming conventional NLLS methods, especially under noisy conditions (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.80 vs 0.65, <i>P</i> < .001 for epithelium volume at SNR of 20:1). In in vivo validation, PIA's noninvasive volume fraction estimates matched quantitative histology (ICC, 0.94, 0.85, and 0.92 for epithelium, stroma, and lumen compartments, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001 for all). PIA's measurements strongly correlated with PCa aggressiveness (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>P</i> < .001). Furthermore, PIA ran 10 000 faster than NLLS (0.18 second vs 40 minutes per image). Conclusion PIA provided accurate prostate tissue biomarker measurements from MRI data with better robustness to noise and computational efficiency compared with the NLLS algorithm. The results demonstrate the potential of PIA as an accurate, noninvasive, and explainable artificial intelligence method for PCa detection. <b>Keywords:</b> Prostate, Stacked Auto-Encoders, Tissue Characterization, MR-Diffusion-weighted Imaging <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> ©RSNA, 2025 See also commentary by Adams and Bressem in this issue.

Radiology Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7(2)
Northwestern University (US), University of Chicago (US)
Sanford J. Grossman Charitable Trust, National Institutes of Health, University of Chicago Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.