Gender-essentialist beliefs and the gender gap in STEM: Evidence on the gender-essentialism theory

Abstract Horizontal gender segregation persists and is higher in more developed countries (gender-equality paradox). According to the theory of gender essentialism, more developed countries are characterized by more individualism, which in turn pushes individuals to rely more on personal characteristics when deciding about their future careers. The presence of both essentialist beliefs on gender and the endorsement of the stereotypical beliefs that math and science are “for boys” could explain the so-called paradox. By exploiting the large dataset collected by Project Implicit, the study tested the different associations of gender essentialism and implicit and explicit gender stereotypes with attitudes toward science of young women aged 15–19 in 51 countries. The results confirmed that both essentialist and stereotypical beliefs are negatively associated with attitudes toward science, still with differences in the strength of the association. Furthermore, the association between gender essentialism and attitudes toward science is stronger in more developed countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality & Quantity
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02057-2
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender-essentialist beliefs and the gender gap in STEM: Evidence on the gender-essentialism theory

Elena De Gioannis
5 citations
Quality & Quantity
Social and Intergroup Psychology
21.01
article

Gender-essentialist beliefs and the gender gap in STEM: Evidence on the gender-essentialism theory

Elena De Gioannis
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Horizontal gender segregation persists and is higher in more developed countries (gender-equality paradox). According to the theory of gender essentialism, more developed countries are characterized by more individualism, which in turn pushes individuals to rely more on personal characteristics when deciding about their future careers. The presence of both essentialist beliefs on gender and the endorsement of the stereotypical beliefs that math and science are “for boys” could explain the so-called paradox. By exploiting the large dataset collected by Project Implicit, the study tested the different associations of gender essentialism and implicit and explicit gender stereotypes with attitudes toward science of young women aged 15–19 in 51 countries. The results confirmed that both essentialist and stereotypical beliefs are negatively associated with attitudes toward science, still with differences in the strength of the association. Furthermore, the association between gender essentialism and attitudes toward science is stronger in more developed countries.

Quality & QuantityVol. 59(S2)
University of Milan (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
21.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gender-essentialist beliefs and the gender gap in STEM: Evidence on the gender-essentialism theory — Elena De Gioannis · Quality & Quantity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS