Use of artificial intelligence in submucosal vessel detection during third-space endoscopy

While artificial intelligence (AI) shows high potential in decision support for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Third-space endoscopic procedures pose the risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI algorithm for intraprocedural blood vessel detection.Using a test dataset of 101 standardized video clips containing 200 predefined submucosal blood vessels, 19 endoscopists were evaluated for vessel detection rate (VDR) and time (VDT) with and without support of an AI algorithm. Endoscopists were grouped according to experience in endoscopic submucosal dissection.With AI support, endoscopist VDR increased from 56.4% (95%CI CI 54.1-58.6) to 72.4% (95%CI CI 70.3-74.4). Endoscopist VDT dropped from 6.7 seconds (95%CI 6.2-7.1) to 5.2 seconds (95%CI 4.8-5.7). False-positive readings appeared in 4.5% of frames and were marked for a significantly shorter time than true positives (0.7 seconds [95%CI 0.55-0.87] vs. 6.0 seconds [95%CI 5.28-6.70]).AI improved the VDR and VDT of endoscopists during third-space endoscopy. While these data need to be corroborated by clinical trials, AI may prove to be an invaluable tool for improving safety and speed of endoscopic interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2534-1164
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of artificial intelligence in submucosal vessel detection during third-space endoscopy

Christoph Römmele, Anna Muzalyova, Konstantinos Kouladouros, Andreas Probst et al.
10 citations
Endoscopy
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
15.18
article

Use of artificial intelligence in submucosal vessel detection during third-space endoscopy

Christoph Römmele, Anna Muzalyova, Konstantinos Kouladouros, Andreas Probst, Benjamin Walter, Christoph Palm, Markus W. Scheppach, David Rauber, Hon Chi Yip, Robert Mendel, Alanna Ebigbo, Sandra Nagl, Stefan Gölder, M. Meinikheim, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Louis Ho Shing Lau, Mohamed Abdelhafez, H Messmann, Arthur Schmidt
article en
10 citations

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI) shows high potential in decision support for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy, its role in therapeutic endoscopy remains unclear. Third-space endoscopic procedures pose the risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Therefore, we aimed to develop an AI algorithm for intraprocedural blood vessel detection.Using a test dataset of 101 standardized video clips containing 200 predefined submucosal blood vessels, 19 endoscopists were evaluated for vessel detection rate (VDR) and time (VDT) with and without support of an AI algorithm. Endoscopists were grouped according to experience in endoscopic submucosal dissection.With AI support, endoscopist VDR increased from 56.4% (95%CI CI 54.1-58.6) to 72.4% (95%CI CI 70.3-74.4). Endoscopist VDT dropped from 6.7 seconds (95%CI 6.2-7.1) to 5.2 seconds (95%CI 4.8-5.7). False-positive readings appeared in 4.5% of frames and were marked for a significantly shorter time than true positives (0.7 seconds [95%CI 0.55-0.87] vs. 6.0 seconds [95%CI 5.28-6.70]).AI improved the VDR and VDT of endoscopists during third-space endoscopy. While these data need to be corroborated by clinical trials, AI may prove to be an invaluable tool for improving safety and speed of endoscopic interventions.

EndoscopyVol. 57(07)
OTH Regensburg (DE), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Augsburg (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), Robert Bosch Hospital (DE), Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
15.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.