Engaging People With Lived Experience of Psychological Disorders: Current Research and Future Directions for Community-Engaged Measure Development in Psychological Science

The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241304339
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging People With Lived Experience of Psychological Disorders: Current Research and Future Directions for Community-Engaged Measure Development in Psychological Science

Hanna M. Hebden, Katie A. Witkiewitz, Leonard J. Simms, Liliana Spurgeon et al.
5 citations
Clinical Psychological Science
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
14.08
article

Engaging People With Lived Experience of Psychological Disorders: Current Research and Future Directions for Community-Engaged Measure Development in Psychological Science

Hanna M. Hebden, Katie A. Witkiewitz, Leonard J. Simms, Liliana Spurgeon, K Venner, Cassandra L. Boness, David T. Lardier, Ashli Timmons
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 13(4)
University of New Mexico (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), The Recovery Center (US), Institute of Behavioral Sciences (JP), Behavioral Health Services (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
14.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.