Pushing the boundaries of neurosurgical oncology: evaluating the superiority of supratotal resection over gross total resection in intraoperative MRI-guided glioma surgery

Using intraoperative MRI (iMRI) in glioma surgery can enhance the extent of resection (EOR) and improve survival rates for patients diagnosed with low grade gliomas (LGG) or high grade gliomas (HGG). This study focused on patients who underwent iMRI-guided surgery for LGG and HGG at our center. Our objective was to compare the patient survival time and recurrence rate between supratotal resection (SpTR) and gross total resection(GTR). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing SpTR with GTR using iMRI in glioma surgery. This study included 71 patients who had undergone iMRI-guided GTR and SpTR. The volume of the tumors was measured using postcontrast 3D T1W series and 3D FLAIR series taken the day before surgery, and the volume of the operation cavity was calculated from iMRI images. The effects of SpTR and GTR on overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) were analyzed by the log-rank test using Kaplan‒Meier curves. The associations between the extent of resection and tumor grade, and between recurrence and tumor grade were examined using the chi-square test. The rate of recurrence in patients diagnosed with HGG was greater than that in patients diagnosed with LGG (p = 0.022). While patients who received SpTR had a greater OS time (105.9 months) than did those who underwent GTR (92.8 months), the difference was not statistically significant. The patients with LGG had a significantly longer PFS time than did the patients with HGG (86.5 ± 5.9 months, 95% CI = 74.9-98.2, p < 0.0001). Of 23 patients diagnosed with HGG, SpTR was achieved in 9 and GTR was achieved in 14. The median OS time was longer in patients who underwent SpTR than in those who underwent GTR, but there was no statistically significant difference [101.2 ± 20.5 months (95% CI: 80.7-121.7) vs. 70.6 ± 9.9 (95% CI: 60.7-80.5) p = 0.9]. Neurosurgeons are increasingly choosing SpTR, especially in LGGs. Despite their slow growth, LGGs retain the potential for malignant transformation. This situation underscores the importance of maximum safe resection in the surgery of LGGs. iMRI-guided resection makes it easier for surgeons to show the EOR concurrent with the operation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgical Review
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03301-x
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pushing the boundaries of neurosurgical oncology: evaluating the superiority of supratotal resection over gross total resection in intraoperative MRI-guided glioma surgery

Ahmet Memduh Kaymaz, Leyla Mirzayeva, Salih Budak, Nezih Yaylı et al.
4 citations
Neurosurgical Review
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
6.50
article

Pushing the boundaries of neurosurgical oncology: evaluating the superiority of supratotal resection over gross total resection in intraoperative MRI-guided glioma surgery

Ahmet Memduh Kaymaz, Leyla Mirzayeva, Salih Budak, Nezih Yaylı, Murat Uçar
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Using intraoperative MRI (iMRI) in glioma surgery can enhance the extent of resection (EOR) and improve survival rates for patients diagnosed with low grade gliomas (LGG) or high grade gliomas (HGG). This study focused on patients who underwent iMRI-guided surgery for LGG and HGG at our center. Our objective was to compare the patient survival time and recurrence rate between supratotal resection (SpTR) and gross total resection(GTR). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing SpTR with GTR using iMRI in glioma surgery. This study included 71 patients who had undergone iMRI-guided GTR and SpTR. The volume of the tumors was measured using postcontrast 3D T1W series and 3D FLAIR series taken the day before surgery, and the volume of the operation cavity was calculated from iMRI images. The effects of SpTR and GTR on overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) were analyzed by the log-rank test using Kaplan‒Meier curves. The associations between the extent of resection and tumor grade, and between recurrence and tumor grade were examined using the chi-square test. The rate of recurrence in patients diagnosed with HGG was greater than that in patients diagnosed with LGG (p = 0.022). While patients who received SpTR had a greater OS time (105.9 months) than did those who underwent GTR (92.8 months), the difference was not statistically significant. The patients with LGG had a significantly longer PFS time than did the patients with HGG (86.5 ± 5.9 months, 95% CI = 74.9-98.2, p < 0.0001). Of 23 patients diagnosed with HGG, SpTR was achieved in 9 and GTR was achieved in 14. The median OS time was longer in patients who underwent SpTR than in those who underwent GTR, but there was no statistically significant difference [101.2 ± 20.5 months (95% CI: 80.7-121.7) vs. 70.6 ± 9.9 (95% CI: 60.7-80.5) p = 0.9]. Neurosurgeons are increasingly choosing SpTR, especially in LGGs. Despite their slow growth, LGGs retain the potential for malignant transformation. This situation underscores the importance of maximum safe resection in the surgery of LGGs. iMRI-guided resection makes it easier for surgeons to show the EOR concurrent with the operation.

Neurosurgical ReviewVol. 48(1)
Hacettepe University (TR), Gazi University (TR)
Gazi Üniversitesi
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.