Effects of Mitigating Information about Negative News Using Comparative vs. Selective Processing

Abstract As consumers learn about a company’s actions, information about negative actions could impact customer purchase decisions. Of interest to firms is how customers process this information when making evaluative decisions. Two experiments explore the effect of comparative and selective processing on brand choice when participants are given negative information about company manufacturing practices to test whether the information affected product choice. The results show that participants were less focused on positive aspects of a focal product and less likely to choose it when engaging in comparative processing compared to those engaging in selective processing. Mitigating information about the negative information made participants more likely to choose the firm’s products compared to those that did not receive the mitigating information. These results provide insight as to how companies can communicate to customers to help reduce the negative impact of negative news. Public relations efforts should be designed in a way that encourages consumers to engage in comparative processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Reputation Review
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-025-00218-5
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Mitigating Information about Negative News Using Comparative vs. Selective Processing

Steven E. Koppitsch
Corporate Reputation Review
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Effects of Mitigating Information about Negative News Using Comparative vs. Selective Processing

Steven E. Koppitsch
article en

Abstract

Abstract As consumers learn about a company’s actions, information about negative actions could impact customer purchase decisions. Of interest to firms is how customers process this information when making evaluative decisions. Two experiments explore the effect of comparative and selective processing on brand choice when participants are given negative information about company manufacturing practices to test whether the information affected product choice. The results show that participants were less focused on positive aspects of a focal product and less likely to choose it when engaging in comparative processing compared to those engaging in selective processing. Mitigating information about the negative information made participants more likely to choose the firm’s products compared to those that did not receive the mitigating information. These results provide insight as to how companies can communicate to customers to help reduce the negative impact of negative news. Public relations efforts should be designed in a way that encourages consumers to engage in comparative processing.

Corporate Reputation Review
Bowling Green State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.