Pathways and processes to adopting or switching to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently endorsed a single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination (HPVV) schedule, but adoption of the revised immunization schedule has not been uniform, notably in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with outsized cervical cancer burdens. We sought to characterize the sequence of events, as well as actors/institutions involved, that facilitate or impede country-level decision-making related to the HPVV schedule. From September 2023 to February 2024, we conducted 66 semi-structured interviews with national immunization stakeholders from 19 LMICs in Africa and Asia, sampled purposively by the maturity of the HPVV program and HPVV schedule. Using purposive text analysis to synthesize emerging insights from interviews, we qualitatively discerned a sequence of decision-making pathways and processes, including actors involved at each stage of the decision-making continuum, related to adoption or switch to an HPVV single-dose schedule. We identified six key sequential steps LMICs follow when deciding on an HPV dosing schedule. Firstly, the new recommendation emerges where WHO and the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) release new HPV vaccine recommendations. Second, the information is shared with the Ministry of Health (MoH) and Expanded Programme for Immunization (EPI). The MoH is informed, and they convene a National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) to assess the new HPV vaccine schedule recommendation. Third, there is the review and consideration of evidence. The NITAG reviews evidence on factors like cost-effectiveness, supply chain, disease burden, and anticipated vaccine hesitancy. Fourth, the NITAG deliberates, achieves consensus, and submits a recommendation to the MoH, which endorses the NITAG's recommendation or requests additional evidence/information before rendering a final decision on the immunization schedule. Fifth and finally, the Interagency Coordination Committee (ICC) reviews the MoH's recommendation and provides final authorization before changes to the HPV immunization schedule is communicated to Gavi.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004245
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways and processes to adopting or switching to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study

Rupali J. Limaye, Joseph G. Rosen, Megan Wysong, Erica N. Rosser et al.
2 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
2.71
article

Pathways and processes to adopting or switching to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study

Rupali J. Limaye, Joseph G. Rosen, Megan Wysong, Erica N. Rosser, Suchismita Roy, Ishani Sheth, Casey Geddes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently endorsed a single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination (HPVV) schedule, but adoption of the revised immunization schedule has not been uniform, notably in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with outsized cervical cancer burdens. We sought to characterize the sequence of events, as well as actors/institutions involved, that facilitate or impede country-level decision-making related to the HPVV schedule. From September 2023 to February 2024, we conducted 66 semi-structured interviews with national immunization stakeholders from 19 LMICs in Africa and Asia, sampled purposively by the maturity of the HPVV program and HPVV schedule. Using purposive text analysis to synthesize emerging insights from interviews, we qualitatively discerned a sequence of decision-making pathways and processes, including actors involved at each stage of the decision-making continuum, related to adoption or switch to an HPVV single-dose schedule. We identified six key sequential steps LMICs follow when deciding on an HPV dosing schedule. Firstly, the new recommendation emerges where WHO and the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) release new HPV vaccine recommendations. Second, the information is shared with the Ministry of Health (MoH) and Expanded Programme for Immunization (EPI). The MoH is informed, and they convene a National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) to assess the new HPV vaccine schedule recommendation. Third, there is the review and consideration of evidence. The NITAG reviews evidence on factors like cost-effectiveness, supply chain, disease burden, and anticipated vaccine hesitancy. Fourth, the NITAG deliberates, achieves consensus, and submits a recommendation to the MoH, which endorses the NITAG's recommendation or requests additional evidence/information before rendering a final decision on the immunization schedule. Fifth and finally, the Interagency Coordination Committee (ICC) reviews the MoH's recommendation and provides final authorization before changes to the HPV immunization schedule is communicated to Gavi.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(2)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
2.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.