P2P Energy Trading: Peer Matching and Price Negotiation Considering Network Usage Charges

Peer-to-Peer(P2P) energy trading is a widely acknowledged methodology for local energy transactions with widespread distributed renewable installation, supporting local area balancing. Peer-matching aligns demand-supply bids with attractive energy price offers to maximize prosumer participation. However, focusing only on better price offers without considering network use may lead to increased losses and congestion to the local grid and, eventually prosumers' revenue loss. Post-peer matching, fair peer-centric energy trading price addressing prosumers' behaviour and market dynamics is essential. This paper proposes an iterative one-to-many peer-matching algorithm integrating Network Usage Charges(NUCs) for peer matching and a fair peer-centric energy pricing algorithm using alternating offer Nash bargain negotiation mechanism. Iterative one-to-many peer-matching algorithm will reduce utility grid's interference. NUCs are calculated through distribution locational marginal pricing reflecting network operational cost. The price negotiation algorithm considers market dynamics and prosumers' greediness for energy pricing. Simulation results on the proposed approach enhance prosumer participation and reduce reliance on utility grid. NUC's consideration in mitigating network congestion and losses resulting from energy transactions is highlighted. Finally, fair energy trading price is determined among matched peers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2025.3538503
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P2P Energy Trading: Peer Matching and Price Negotiation Considering Network Usage Charges

Rohit Bhakar, Chandra Prakash Barala, Ritisha Singh, Ravi Rakeshkumar Trivedi et al.
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Digital Platforms and Economics
4.45
article

P2P Energy Trading: Peer Matching and Price Negotiation Considering Network Usage Charges

Rohit Bhakar, Chandra Prakash Barala, Ritisha Singh, Ravi Rakeshkumar Trivedi, Parul Mathuria
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Peer-to-Peer(P2P) energy trading is a widely acknowledged methodology for local energy transactions with widespread distributed renewable installation, supporting local area balancing. Peer-matching aligns demand-supply bids with attractive energy price offers to maximize prosumer participation. However, focusing only on better price offers without considering network use may lead to increased losses and congestion to the local grid and, eventually prosumers' revenue loss. Post-peer matching, fair peer-centric energy trading price addressing prosumers' behaviour and market dynamics is essential. This paper proposes an iterative one-to-many peer-matching algorithm integrating Network Usage Charges(NUCs) for peer matching and a fair peer-centric energy pricing algorithm using alternating offer Nash bargain negotiation mechanism. Iterative one-to-many peer-matching algorithm will reduce utility grid's interference. NUCs are calculated through distribution locational marginal pricing reflecting network operational cost. The price negotiation algorithm considers market dynamics and prosumers' greediness for energy pricing. Simulation results on the proposed approach enhance prosumer participation and reduce reliance on utility grid. NUC's consideration in mitigating network congestion and losses resulting from energy transactions is highlighted. Finally, fair energy trading price is determined among matched peers.

IEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsVol. 61(3)
Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Platforms and Economics
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.