Theoretical analysis and simulation verification for measuring the geometric distances between the silicon spheres with the laser interferometer in G measurement

Abstract The Newtonian gravitational constant G is one of the most fundamental constants in nature. In G measurement with the angular acceleration feedback method, the largest error comes from the distances between the geometric centers of the source masses. In the on-going experiment, the silicon spheres with a more homogeneous density are used as the source masses. Here a scheme of measuring the geometric distances between the silicon spheres with the laser interferometer is proposed. The measurement principle is analyzed, and the error sources, such as the laser, the sphere, the alignment of optical path, and the environment are evaluated. With this method, the horizontal and vertical geometric distances can be measured with uncertainties of 11 nm and 9 nm, respectively. The simulation is performed to verify the theoretical model of measuring the distance, where the maximum deviation between the simulation result and the theoretical one is only −2.7 nm. When the sphericities of the four silicon spheres are at the level of 0.1 µ m, the uncertainty of each distance after considering the sphericity is about 0.1 µ m, corresponds to a combined uncertainty of 0.6 ppm for G measurement with the angular acceleration feedback method. This provides an effective method to reduce the measurement uncertainty of geometric distance between the silicon spheres, and makes it possible to measure G with a higher precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/adb2d6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theoretical analysis and simulation verification for measuring the geometric distances between the silicon spheres with the laser interferometer in G measurement

Tong Huang, Ruiqi Liu, Qiangbing Mao, Qing Li et al.
3 citations
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
2.14
article

Theoretical analysis and simulation verification for measuring the geometric distances between the silicon spheres with the laser interferometer in G measurement

Tong Huang, Ruiqi Liu, Qiangbing Mao, Qing Li, Yanjie Zhang, Ruijie Li, Lingling Yang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Newtonian gravitational constant G is one of the most fundamental constants in nature. In G measurement with the angular acceleration feedback method, the largest error comes from the distances between the geometric centers of the source masses. In the on-going experiment, the silicon spheres with a more homogeneous density are used as the source masses. Here a scheme of measuring the geometric distances between the silicon spheres with the laser interferometer is proposed. The measurement principle is analyzed, and the error sources, such as the laser, the sphere, the alignment of optical path, and the environment are evaluated. With this method, the horizontal and vertical geometric distances can be measured with uncertainties of 11 nm and 9 nm, respectively. The simulation is performed to verify the theoretical model of measuring the distance, where the maximum deviation between the simulation result and the theoretical one is only −2.7 nm. When the sphericities of the four silicon spheres are at the level of 0.1 µ m, the uncertainty of each distance after considering the sphericity is about 0.1 µ m, corresponds to a combined uncertainty of 0.6 ppm for G measurement with the angular acceleration feedback method. This provides an effective method to reduce the measurement uncertainty of geometric distance between the silicon spheres, and makes it possible to measure G with a higher precision.

Classical and Quantum GravityVol. 42(5)
East China University of Technology (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.