Implications of Chinese overseas mining operations for community-level social conflict

• Chinese mining MNCs do not confront more conflict than other foreign-owned MNCs . • A large- n quantitative test on Chinese mining firms’ behaviors. • Legacy conflict matters in explaining mining conflict. In the context of increasing foreign mining activities and their impacts, and the growing number of social conflicts resulting from mining operations, this paper investigates whether Chinese multinational corporation (MNC) investment is positively associated with social conflict, and if so, whether that relationship is a result of MNC practices, and/or other factors. Broadly speaking, scholars paint a picture in which China's political regime together with its national culture and its economic development path influence Chinese extractive MNCs’ activities abroad and might contribute to more social conflict. At the same time, scholars writing on extractive conflicts have argued that conflicts result from companies’ inadequate performances, especially regarding community engagement practices. That is, in this second view, social conflict is due to mistakes that any company could make; that is, there is no “Chinese way” of operating abroad. The paper asks: Are Chinese mining MNCs’ operations more prone to social conflict than non-Chinese MNCs’ operations? If so, how? To what extent do firm practices explain variation in conflict? Through quantitative and Geographical Information System (GIS) analysis of an original database of 1001 mining properties worldwide, this paper finds that Chinese MNCs do not confront more conflict than other foreign-owned MNCs. This finding has theoretical contributions as the results that Chinese mining MNCs do not perform worse threaten to falsify much of what has been discussed about Chinese mining firms, that they behave worse and cause conflict. The study contributes to our understanding of extractive conflict, with implications for the trajectory of extractive sectors and, in turn, alternative or sustainable development options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Extractive Industries and Society
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101619
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of Chinese overseas mining operations for community-level social conflict

Yu Cao
The Extractive Industries and Society
Mining and Resource Management
article

Implications of Chinese overseas mining operations for community-level social conflict

Yu Cao
article en

Abstract

• Chinese mining MNCs do not confront more conflict than other foreign-owned MNCs . • A large- n quantitative test on Chinese mining firms’ behaviors. • Legacy conflict matters in explaining mining conflict. In the context of increasing foreign mining activities and their impacts, and the growing number of social conflicts resulting from mining operations, this paper investigates whether Chinese multinational corporation (MNC) investment is positively associated with social conflict, and if so, whether that relationship is a result of MNC practices, and/or other factors. Broadly speaking, scholars paint a picture in which China's political regime together with its national culture and its economic development path influence Chinese extractive MNCs’ activities abroad and might contribute to more social conflict. At the same time, scholars writing on extractive conflicts have argued that conflicts result from companies’ inadequate performances, especially regarding community engagement practices. That is, in this second view, social conflict is due to mistakes that any company could make; that is, there is no “Chinese way” of operating abroad. The paper asks: Are Chinese mining MNCs’ operations more prone to social conflict than non-Chinese MNCs’ operations? If so, how? To what extent do firm practices explain variation in conflict? Through quantitative and Geographical Information System (GIS) analysis of an original database of 1001 mining properties worldwide, this paper finds that Chinese MNCs do not confront more conflict than other foreign-owned MNCs. This finding has theoretical contributions as the results that Chinese mining MNCs do not perform worse threaten to falsify much of what has been discussed about Chinese mining firms, that they behave worse and cause conflict. The study contributes to our understanding of extractive conflict, with implications for the trajectory of extractive sectors and, in turn, alternative or sustainable development options.

The Extractive Industries and SocietyVol. 22
University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), Alaska Department of Natural Resources (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.