MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF VANCOUVER TYPE B PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Periprosthetic femoral fractures are a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty. The Vancouver classification divides fractures on location, implant stability and residual bone stock. The treatment of Vancouver B fractures is surgical and the first decision point surrounds whether or not the stem is well-fixed: well-fixed stems require Open Reduction and Internal Fixation, whereas loose stems require revision arthroplasty. Vancouver B1 fractures are treated with ORIF and had a poorer outcome when compared with B2 and B3 fractures because some B1 fractures were, in reality, probably B2 fractures. In Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures, the stem is loose and the revision of implant is mandatory. Controversy remains around the indications to perform ORIF or revision for Vancouver B fracture. In the future, it could be useful to combine information from both the radiographs and the medical records in order to be able to more correctly evaluate the type of fracture and its treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3269/1970-5492.2020.15.47
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF VANCOUVER TYPE B PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Giuseppe Evola
EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES OF VANCOUVER TYPE B PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Giuseppe Evola
article en

Abstract

Periprosthetic femoral fractures are a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty. The Vancouver classification divides fractures on location, implant stability and residual bone stock. The treatment of Vancouver B fractures is surgical and the first decision point surrounds whether or not the stem is well-fixed: well-fixed stems require Open Reduction and Internal Fixation, whereas loose stems require revision arthroplasty. Vancouver B1 fractures are treated with ORIF and had a poorer outcome when compared with B2 and B3 fractures because some B1 fractures were, in reality, probably B2 fractures. In Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures, the stem is loose and the revision of implant is mandatory. Controversy remains around the indications to perform ORIF or revision for Vancouver B fracture. In the future, it could be useful to combine information from both the radiographs and the medical records in order to be able to more correctly evaluate the type of fracture and its treatment.

EuroMediterranean Biomedical JournalVol. 15
Ospedale Garibaldi (IT), Ospedale Cannizzaro (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.