Transgressing the Borders of Art and Non-art: The Case of Elmerice Parts and Herman Kolt-Oginsky

Abstract Modern dance made its way to Estonia in the 1910s. By putting on stage a new woman and picturing her in a new way, modern dance challenged many members of society, sometimes even being seen as disgraceful. In 1926 and 1927, Elmerice Parts (1878–1974) and Herman Kolt-Oginsky (1902–1977) created scandals with their dance numbers in Estonia. According to reviewers, the dancers transgressed the line between art and non-art. The artists were attacked for making use of acrobatic and “erotic” elements; not surprisingly, the latter aspect was seen more critically. The aim of this article is to understand where the line between art and non-art lay in the 1920s. I come to the conclusion that artfulness was associated predominantly with spirituality and the unconscious: When the dancer focused on bodily experiences and highlighted their physical body parts, it became non-art. The main source of information is articles published in print media in 1926 and 1927. I analysed the data using qualitative methods.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic journal of dance
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/njd-2024-0012
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transgressing the Borders of Art and Non-art: The Case of Elmerice Parts and Herman Kolt-Oginsky

Anne-Liis Maripuu
Nordic journal of dance
Philosophy, Science, and History
article

Transgressing the Borders of Art and Non-art: The Case of Elmerice Parts and Herman Kolt-Oginsky

Anne-Liis Maripuu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Modern dance made its way to Estonia in the 1910s. By putting on stage a new woman and picturing her in a new way, modern dance challenged many members of society, sometimes even being seen as disgraceful. In 1926 and 1927, Elmerice Parts (1878–1974) and Herman Kolt-Oginsky (1902–1977) created scandals with their dance numbers in Estonia. According to reviewers, the dancers transgressed the line between art and non-art. The artists were attacked for making use of acrobatic and “erotic” elements; not surprisingly, the latter aspect was seen more critically. The aim of this article is to understand where the line between art and non-art lay in the 1920s. I come to the conclusion that artfulness was associated predominantly with spirituality and the unconscious: When the dancer focused on bodily experiences and highlighted their physical body parts, it became non-art. The main source of information is articles published in print media in 1926 and 1927. I analysed the data using qualitative methods.

Nordic journal of danceVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Philosophy, Science, and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transgressing the Borders of Art and Non-art: The Case of Elmerice Parts and Herman Kolt-Oginsky — Anne-Liis Maripuu · Nordic journal of dance (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS