Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Retroperitoneal approach for robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) has been shown to offer shorter operative times and hospital stays without differences in complication rates compared with the transperitoneal approach. The single-port (SP) system may be better suited than multiport (MP) for challenges with the retroperitoneal approach such as narrow access geometry. We evaluated if the adoption of SP PN increased the utilization of retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved multi-institutional database of all PN from 2013 to 2023. The date of the first SP PN split the cohorts before and after SP adoption. The percentage of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach cases overall and for SP and MP was determined before and after adoption. Joinpoint analysis assessed changes in rates of the retroperitoneal approach. Logistic regression compared patient and tumor characteristics with retroperitoneal approach PN before and after adoption of SP. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall 1959 patients were evaluated, of which 654 were performed prior versus 1305 after SP adoption. There was an increased percentage of retroperitoneal approach after adoption, with 7.3% (48/654) before compared with 24.8% (324/1305) after adoption. The percentage of the retroperitoneal approach for SP PN was 52.8% (134/254), increasing over time with 75% (24/32) of SP in 2023 performed with a retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently than the transperitoneal approach in the SP cohort. The adoption of SP increased the incidence of the retroperitoneal approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0305
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium

Simone Crivellaro, Kennedy E. Okhawere, Roxana Ramos‐Carpinteyro, Craig Rogers et al.
9 citations
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
13.67
article

Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium

Simone Crivellaro, Kennedy E. Okhawere, Roxana Ramos‐Carpinteyro, Craig Rogers, Indu Saini, Reza Mehrazin, Ashok K. Hemal, Phillip M. Pierorazio, Nirmish Singla, James Porter, Ruchir Chaturvedi, Mubashir Billah, Akshay Bhandari, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Ketan K. Badani, Benjamin Inbeh Chung, Nicolas Soputro, Michael Raver, Milan Patel, Ahmed M. Mansour, Michael Stifelman, Ronney Abaza, Mutahar Ahmed, Jihad Kaouk
article en
9 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Retroperitoneal approach for robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) has been shown to offer shorter operative times and hospital stays without differences in complication rates compared with the transperitoneal approach. The single-port (SP) system may be better suited than multiport (MP) for challenges with the retroperitoneal approach such as narrow access geometry. We evaluated if the adoption of SP PN increased the utilization of retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved multi-institutional database of all PN from 2013 to 2023. The date of the first SP PN split the cohorts before and after SP adoption. The percentage of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach cases overall and for SP and MP was determined before and after adoption. Joinpoint analysis assessed changes in rates of the retroperitoneal approach. Logistic regression compared patient and tumor characteristics with retroperitoneal approach PN before and after adoption of SP. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall 1959 patients were evaluated, of which 654 were performed prior versus 1305 after SP adoption. There was an increased percentage of retroperitoneal approach after adoption, with 7.3% (48/654) before compared with 24.8% (324/1305) after adoption. The percentage of the retroperitoneal approach for SP PN was 52.8% (134/254), increasing over time with 75% (24/32) of SP in 2023 performed with a retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently than the transperitoneal approach in the SP cohort. The adoption of SP increased the incidence of the retroperitoneal approach.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesVol. 35(2)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Hackensack University Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Swedish Medical Center (US), Central Ohio Radiation Oncology (US), Mount Sinai Medical Center (US), Center for Discovery (US), Wake Forest University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
13.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.