MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF AGRICULTURAL-BASED PROJECT OUTCOMES ON HOUSEHOLD FOOD SECURITY IN MURANG’A COUNTY, KENYA
Objectives: This study investigates the role of monitoring and evaluation (M&E) practices in improving agricultural project outcomes and addressing household food insecurity in Murang’a County, Kenya. Theoretical Framework: Grounded in Change Theory, this study highlights how systematic M&E processes align activities with project goals, promoting accountability, resource optimization, and outcome sustainability. Method: A mixed-methods approach was utilized, collecting quantitative data from 383 respondents through structured questionnaires and qualitative insights via interviews. Regression and correlation analyses were applied to identify significant relationships. Results and Discussion: Findings revealed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.201, p < 0.05) between robust M&E frameworks and food security improvements. Key factors included readiness assessments, accountability, and produce storage. Challenges such as limited funding and inadequate training hindered effectiveness. Research Implications: Policymakers are encouraged to integrate community-inclusive, results-based M&E systems into agricultural projects. Recommendations include capacity building, technological adoption for real-time data, and fostering stakeholder collaboration to ensure sustainability. Originality/Value: This research advances the understanding of M&E’s role in achieving sustainable agricultural outcomes. It provides a replicable model for improving food security in similar rural contexts through effective monitoring frameworks.
Authors
- Dorothy Ndunge Kyalo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8789-9965)
- Timothy Maitho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2649-5788)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Professional Business Review
- Published
- 2025-02-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2025.v10i2.5269
- Primary Topic
- Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00