Development of Patient-Specific Nomogram to Assist in Clinical Decision-Making for Single Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Robotic Consortium

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To develop a patient-specific algorithm to better guide clinical decision-making when considering between single port (SP) and multi-port (MP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review was performed on the institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained multi-institutional database of the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium to identify all consecutive patients who underwent SP and MP-RPN between 2019 and 2023. Baseline clinicodemographic variables were used to identify the significant predictors of SP-RPN. The significant variables were used to construct a nomogram to predict the likelihood of SP vs MP-RPN. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 1021 patients included in our analysis, 189 (18.5%) and 832 (81.5%) underwent SP and MP-RPN, respectively. Statistically significant predictors of SP-RPN included a lower comorbidity profile, a significant abdominal surgical history as characterized by a higher Hostile Abdomen Index, as well as tumors of lower complexity. The nomogram generated using the aforementioned variables demonstrated a reasonable performance with an area under the curve of 0.79. An optimal cutoff point was determined, with likelihood ratios above 0.12 indicating a preference for SP-RPN. Of note, all SP-RPN cases that scored above the 0.12 cutoff exhibited improved perioperative outcomes, including shorter ischemia time and less intraoperative blood loss. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this study, we have devised a novel patient selection nomogram aimed at enhancing clinical decision-making within the expanding repertoire of RPN approaches. The findings highlighted in this study offer valuable guidance to facilitate appropriate patient selection and thereby ensuring favorable perioperative outcomes associated with RPN procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endourology
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0547
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of Patient-Specific Nomogram to Assist in Clinical Decision-Making for Single Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Robotic Consortium

Simone Crivellaro, Kennedy E. Okhawere, Roxana Ramos‐Carpinteyro, Michael Stifelman et al.
8 citations
Journal of Endourology
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
12.15
article

Development of Patient-Specific Nomogram to Assist in Clinical Decision-Making for Single Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Robotic Consortium

Simone Crivellaro, Kennedy E. Okhawere, Roxana Ramos‐Carpinteyro, Michael Stifelman, Craig Rogers, Indu Saini, Ryan J. Nelson, Jaya S. Chavali, Adriana M. Pedraza, Elizabeth Snajdar, Riccardo Autorino, Carter Mikesell, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Adam Lorentz, Bertram Yuh, Celeste Manfredi, Ketan K. Badani, Nicolas Soputro, Michael Raver, Yuzhi Wang, Jihad H. Kaouk, Mutahar Ahmed
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To develop a patient-specific algorithm to better guide clinical decision-making when considering between single port (SP) and multi-port (MP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review was performed on the institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained multi-institutional database of the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium to identify all consecutive patients who underwent SP and MP-RPN between 2019 and 2023. Baseline clinicodemographic variables were used to identify the significant predictors of SP-RPN. The significant variables were used to construct a nomogram to predict the likelihood of SP vs MP-RPN. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 1021 patients included in our analysis, 189 (18.5%) and 832 (81.5%) underwent SP and MP-RPN, respectively. Statistically significant predictors of SP-RPN included a lower comorbidity profile, a significant abdominal surgical history as characterized by a higher Hostile Abdomen Index, as well as tumors of lower complexity. The nomogram generated using the aforementioned variables demonstrated a reasonable performance with an area under the curve of 0.79. An optimal cutoff point was determined, with likelihood ratios above 0.12 indicating a preference for SP-RPN. Of note, all SP-RPN cases that scored above the 0.12 cutoff exhibited improved perioperative outcomes, including shorter ischemia time and less intraoperative blood loss. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this study, we have devised a novel patient selection nomogram aimed at enhancing clinical decision-making within the expanding repertoire of RPN approaches. The findings highlighted in this study offer valuable guidance to facilitate appropriate patient selection and thereby ensuring favorable perioperative outcomes associated with RPN procedures.

Journal of EndourologyVol. 39(3)
Rush University Medical Center (US), City Of Hope National Medical Center (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Hackensack University Medical Center (US), Emory University Hospital (US), Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Michigan Institute of Urology (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), City of Hope (US), Hackensack Meridian Health (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
12.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.