Globale Religionsphilosophie und die notorische Unklarheit des Religionsbegriffs

Abstract This paper discusses the project of a globalised philosophy of religion as proposed recently by Yujin Nagasawa, Victoria Harrison, and others. While this project is a laudable attempt to overcome the strict focus on theistic forms of religion in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion, it is argued that current proposals for a globalised philosophy of religion have ignored the important role of theism for giving the discipline its structure. Therefore, any viable global approach to philosophy of religion needs to delineate a concept of religion that doesn’t draw on the concept of a theistic god. The paper argues that the best choice for this is a cluster concept of religion so that, even if the phenomena covered by the term ‘religion’ have no common core, the term isn’t meaningless, and philosophy of religion can still be a meaningful academic project. Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – Projektnummer 471277286.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2024-0052
Primary Topic
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Globale Religionsphilosophie und die notorische Unklarheit des Religionsbegriffs

Sebastian Gäb
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
article

Globale Religionsphilosophie und die notorische Unklarheit des Religionsbegriffs

Sebastian Gäb
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper discusses the project of a globalised philosophy of religion as proposed recently by Yujin Nagasawa, Victoria Harrison, and others. While this project is a laudable attempt to overcome the strict focus on theistic forms of religion in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion, it is argued that current proposals for a globalised philosophy of religion have ignored the important role of theism for giving the discipline its structure. Therefore, any viable global approach to philosophy of religion needs to delineate a concept of religion that doesn’t draw on the concept of a theistic god. The paper argues that the best choice for this is a cluster concept of religion so that, even if the phenomena covered by the term ‘religion’ have no common core, the term isn’t meaningless, and philosophy of religion can still be a meaningful academic project. Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – Projektnummer 471277286.

Deutsche Zeitschrift für PhilosophieVol. 72(5)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.