Das Ukraine-Dilemma, die Lehre vom gerechten Krieg und der Pazifismus

Abstract How much help are third countries morally allowed or obliged to provide for a state unjustly attacked by a state that might widen a local war into a nuclear world war? This question leads to the Ukraine dilemma. It faces states that deliberate their obligations to the Ukraine unjustly attacked by Russia that might use nuclear weapons. To clarify the question, I examine the two most important evaluations of wars, the just war doctrine ( D ) and pacifism ( P ). My theses are: (1) D is a moral theory, but P is not. P is a practical metaphysics, so they do not exclude one another. (2) Augustine shaped D and directed it against P , interpreting P and tendentially Christianity as moral theories, losing the distinction between practical metaphysics and morality, followed suit by the Enlightenment and current normative theory. (3) To solve the Ukraine dilemma, we must rely on an uninterpreted morality and prudence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2024-0047
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Das Ukraine-Dilemma, die Lehre vom gerechten Krieg und der Pazifismus

Ulrich Steinvorth
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Das Ukraine-Dilemma, die Lehre vom gerechten Krieg und der Pazifismus

Ulrich Steinvorth
article en

Abstract

Abstract How much help are third countries morally allowed or obliged to provide for a state unjustly attacked by a state that might widen a local war into a nuclear world war? This question leads to the Ukraine dilemma. It faces states that deliberate their obligations to the Ukraine unjustly attacked by Russia that might use nuclear weapons. To clarify the question, I examine the two most important evaluations of wars, the just war doctrine ( D ) and pacifism ( P ). My theses are: (1) D is a moral theory, but P is not. P is a practical metaphysics, so they do not exclude one another. (2) Augustine shaped D and directed it against P , interpreting P and tendentially Christianity as moral theories, losing the distinction between practical metaphysics and morality, followed suit by the Enlightenment and current normative theory. (3) To solve the Ukraine dilemma, we must rely on an uninterpreted morality and prudence.

Deutsche Zeitschrift für PhilosophieVol. 72(5)
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Das Ukraine-Dilemma, die Lehre vom gerechten Krieg und der Pazifismus — Ulrich Steinvorth · Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS