Microbiological methodologies: Comparative evaluation of microbial community and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility testing

Microbiological methodologies: Comparative evaluation of microbial community and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility testing This study provides a comparative analysis of microbial community profiling and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) methodologies. Methods such as Shotgun Metagenomics and 16S rRNA sequencing were evaluated based on criteria including resolution, throughput, cost, and reproducibility. Shotgun Metagenomics was found to offer the highest resolution and detailed insights into microbial diversity, though at a higher cost and complexity. In contrast, 16S rRNA Sequencing provided a more cost-effective and high-throughput alternative, suitable for large-scale studies despite lower taxonomic resolution. Culturomics, while offering unique phenotypic data, showed variability in reproducibility and required more labor-intensive processes. Traditional methods such as disk diffusion and broth microdilution were compared to emerging molecular and automated AST technologies. Traditional methods were noted for their precision in determining minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), crucial for guiding effective antimicrobial therapy. However, the emerging methods provided faster turnaround times and higher throughput, which are increasingly important in clinical settings focused on antimicrobial stewardship. The study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies based on specific research or clinical needs, balancing factors such as cost, sensitivity, and throughput. The integration of multiple methodologies is recommended to overcome the limitations of individual techniques, providing a more comprehensive understanding of microbial ecosystems and resistance profiles. These findings are crucial for enhancing both research and clinical practices, particularly in the context of the global challenge posed by antimicrobial resistance. How to cite: Yakobi SH, Nwodo UU. Microbiological methodologies: Comparative evaluation of microbial community and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility testing. Electron J Biotechnol 2025;74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2025.01.001 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2025.01.001
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbiological methodologies: Comparative evaluation of microbial community and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility testing

Uchechukwu U. Nwodo, Sinethemba H. Yakobi
9 citations
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
11.87
article

Microbiological methodologies: Comparative evaluation of microbial community and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility testing

Uchechukwu U. Nwodo, Sinethemba H. Yakobi
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Microbiological methodologies: Comparative evaluation of microbial community and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility testing This study provides a comparative analysis of microbial community profiling and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) methodologies. Methods such as Shotgun Metagenomics and 16S rRNA sequencing were evaluated based on criteria including resolution, throughput, cost, and reproducibility. Shotgun Metagenomics was found to offer the highest resolution and detailed insights into microbial diversity, though at a higher cost and complexity. In contrast, 16S rRNA Sequencing provided a more cost-effective and high-throughput alternative, suitable for large-scale studies despite lower taxonomic resolution. Culturomics, while offering unique phenotypic data, showed variability in reproducibility and required more labor-intensive processes. Traditional methods such as disk diffusion and broth microdilution were compared to emerging molecular and automated AST technologies. Traditional methods were noted for their precision in determining minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), crucial for guiding effective antimicrobial therapy. However, the emerging methods provided faster turnaround times and higher throughput, which are increasingly important in clinical settings focused on antimicrobial stewardship. The study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate methodologies based on specific research or clinical needs, balancing factors such as cost, sensitivity, and throughput. The integration of multiple methodologies is recommended to overcome the limitations of individual techniques, providing a more comprehensive understanding of microbial ecosystems and resistance profiles. These findings are crucial for enhancing both research and clinical practices, particularly in the context of the global challenge posed by antimicrobial resistance. How to cite: Yakobi SH, Nwodo UU. Microbiological methodologies: Comparative evaluation of microbial community and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility testing. Electron J Biotechnol 2025;74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2025.01.001 .

Electronic Journal of BiotechnologyVol. 74
University of Fort Hare (ZA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
11.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.