Testing a weekly utility value intervention in college physics and chemistry courses

• This study tested a UVI embedded in an ecological momentary intervention framework. • UVI increased weekly importance value in physics and chemistry, ds = 0.08–0.20. • UVI increased weekly interest in physics and chemistry, ds = ds = 0.10–0.18. • UVI increased final interest and STEM intentions in chemistry, ds = 0.10–0.11. • UVI increased grades for racially marginalized students in physics, d = 0.48. We developed, implemented, and evaluated a weekly utility-value intervention (UVI) in which college students were asked to reflect on the value of course content using a brief writing prompt for 13 consecutive weeks in two separate courses: physics ( N = 631) and chemistry ( N = 1,348). We used a randomized controlled trial and examined effects on weekly course importance value, weekly course interest, final course interest, STEM career intentions, and performance. Multilevel modeling and linear regression revealed that in both courses, those who participated in the weekly UVI had higher average weekly importance value ( d physics = 0.20, d chemistry = 0.08) and weekly interest ( d physics = 0.18, d chemistry = 0.10) compared to those in the control group. In chemistry, the weekly UVI was also found to be effective in increasing final course interest ( d = 0.10) and STEM career intentions ( d = 0.11). In physics, the weekly UVI increased course grades for racially marginalized students, when compared to racially marginalized students in the control group ( d raciallymarginalized = 0.48, d nonraciallymarginalized = 0.04). Finally, in chemistry, the weekly UVI increased course grades for women, when compared to women in the control group ( d women = 0.08, d men = 0.07). The positive effects on weekly importance value and interest in both courses demonstrate the potential of brief weekly motivational interventions that do not require extensive instructor burden for enhancing college students’ STEM interest and participation. However, mixed long-term effects, course-specific effects, and inconsistent patterns of moderation point to important boundary conditions that may constrain the effectiveness of weekly UVIs unless researchers take steps to mitigate them in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102348
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing a weekly utility value intervention in college physics and chemistry courses

Patrick N. Beymer, Emily Q. Rosenzweig
5 citations
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
44.63
article

Testing a weekly utility value intervention in college physics and chemistry courses

Patrick N. Beymer, Emily Q. Rosenzweig
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• This study tested a UVI embedded in an ecological momentary intervention framework. • UVI increased weekly importance value in physics and chemistry, ds = 0.08–0.20. • UVI increased weekly interest in physics and chemistry, ds = ds = 0.10–0.18. • UVI increased final interest and STEM intentions in chemistry, ds = 0.10–0.11. • UVI increased grades for racially marginalized students in physics, d = 0.48. We developed, implemented, and evaluated a weekly utility-value intervention (UVI) in which college students were asked to reflect on the value of course content using a brief writing prompt for 13 consecutive weeks in two separate courses: physics ( N = 631) and chemistry ( N = 1,348). We used a randomized controlled trial and examined effects on weekly course importance value, weekly course interest, final course interest, STEM career intentions, and performance. Multilevel modeling and linear regression revealed that in both courses, those who participated in the weekly UVI had higher average weekly importance value ( d physics = 0.20, d chemistry = 0.08) and weekly interest ( d physics = 0.18, d chemistry = 0.10) compared to those in the control group. In chemistry, the weekly UVI was also found to be effective in increasing final course interest ( d = 0.10) and STEM career intentions ( d = 0.11). In physics, the weekly UVI increased course grades for racially marginalized students, when compared to racially marginalized students in the control group ( d raciallymarginalized = 0.48, d nonraciallymarginalized = 0.04). Finally, in chemistry, the weekly UVI increased course grades for women, when compared to women in the control group ( d women = 0.08, d men = 0.07). The positive effects on weekly importance value and interest in both courses demonstrate the potential of brief weekly motivational interventions that do not require extensive instructor burden for enhancing college students’ STEM interest and participation. However, mixed long-term effects, course-specific effects, and inconsistent patterns of moderation point to important boundary conditions that may constrain the effectiveness of weekly UVIs unless researchers take steps to mitigate them in future research.

Contemporary Educational PsychologyVol. 80
University of Cincinnati (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
44.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.