Integration of a model-based systems engineering framework with safety assessment for early design phases: A case study for hydrogen-based aircraft fuel system architecting

Novel hydrogen-based aircraft concepts pose significant challenges for the system development process. This paper proposes a generic, adaptable, and multidisciplinary framework for integrated model-based systems engineering (MBSE) and model-based safety assessment (MBSA) for the conceptual design of complex systems. The framework employs a multi-granularity, model-centric approach, whereby the architectural specification is utilized for design as well as query purposes as part of a qualitative and quantitative, graph-based preliminary safety assessment. For the qualitative assessment, design and safety rules based on existing standards and best practices are formalized in the model and applied to a graph-based architecture representation. Consequently, the remaining architectures are quantitatively assessed using automated fault trees. This safety-integrated approach is applied to the conceptual design of a liquid hydrogen fuel system architecture as a novel, uncertain, and complex system with many unknown system interrelations. This paper illustrates the potential of a combined MBSE-MBSA framework to streamline complex, early-stage system design and demonstrates that all qualitatively down-selected hydrogen system architecture variants also satisfy quantitative assessment. Furthermore, it is shown that the design space of novel systems is also constrained by safety and certification requirements, significantly reducing the number of actual feasible solutions. • Development of a multidisciplinary and integrated MBSE and safety assessment framework for conceptual systems architecting. • Enhance the architecture modeling approach to serve as the single source of truth for specification and safety assessments. • Adaption to the graph-based architecture representation to allow for LH2 as a fuel type. • Identification and collection of H2 design and safety rules formalized in the architecture model. • Automation of preliminary safety assessment with the integrated MBSE-MBSA framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104249
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integration of a model-based systems engineering framework with safety assessment for early design phases: A case study for hydrogen-based aircraft fuel system architecting

Andrew K. Jeyaraj, Susan Liscouët-Hanke, Nils Kuelper, Frank Thielecke
8 citations
Results in Engineering
Technology Assessment and Management
10.43
article

Integration of a model-based systems engineering framework with safety assessment for early design phases: A case study for hydrogen-based aircraft fuel system architecting

Andrew K. Jeyaraj, Susan Liscouët-Hanke, Nils Kuelper, Frank Thielecke
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Novel hydrogen-based aircraft concepts pose significant challenges for the system development process. This paper proposes a generic, adaptable, and multidisciplinary framework for integrated model-based systems engineering (MBSE) and model-based safety assessment (MBSA) for the conceptual design of complex systems. The framework employs a multi-granularity, model-centric approach, whereby the architectural specification is utilized for design as well as query purposes as part of a qualitative and quantitative, graph-based preliminary safety assessment. For the qualitative assessment, design and safety rules based on existing standards and best practices are formalized in the model and applied to a graph-based architecture representation. Consequently, the remaining architectures are quantitatively assessed using automated fault trees. This safety-integrated approach is applied to the conceptual design of a liquid hydrogen fuel system architecture as a novel, uncertain, and complex system with many unknown system interrelations. This paper illustrates the potential of a combined MBSE-MBSA framework to streamline complex, early-stage system design and demonstrates that all qualitatively down-selected hydrogen system architecture variants also satisfy quantitative assessment. Furthermore, it is shown that the design space of novel systems is also constrained by safety and certification requirements, significantly reducing the number of actual feasible solutions. • Development of a multidisciplinary and integrated MBSE and safety assessment framework for conceptual systems architecting. • Enhance the architecture modeling approach to serve as the single source of truth for specification and safety assessments. • Adaption to the graph-based architecture representation to allow for LH2 as a fuel type. • Identification and collection of H2 design and safety rules formalized in the architecture model. • Automation of preliminary safety assessment with the integrated MBSE-MBSA framework.

Results in EngineeringVol. 25
Universität Hamburg (DE), Concordia University (CA), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Mitacs
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Technology Assessment and Management
10.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.