Discrete fracture network model benchmarks developed and applied in a DECOVALEX-2023 repository performance assessment study

This study presents newly developed benchmarks for modeling flow and transport within discrete fracture networks (DFNs) and useful methods for analyzing the results. The new benchmarks are designed to test modeling approaches for use in probabilistic performance assessment models of deep geologic repositories in fractured rock. The benchmarks simulate flow and transport through a 1 km³ block of fractured rock. The first simulates migration of a short pulse of tracer through a simple network of four intersecting fractures. The second adds 1089 stochastically generated fractures. The third changes the pulse to a continuous point source. Evaluation of model performance relies on moment analysis and comparison of the results of different models. The expected nondimensional first moment of the conservative tracer for each benchmark is 1. The benchmarks were simulated by teams from Canada, Czechia, Germany, Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United States as part of a DECOVALEX-2023 study (decovalex.org). The teams used various approaches, including explicit DFN modeling, DFN upscaling to an equivalent continuous porous medium (ECPM), and a combination of both methods. Transport mechanisms are modeled using either the advection-dispersion equation or particle tracking. Results demonstrate strong agreement among the models in breakthrough behavior up to the 75th percentile. Significant deviations in first moments and well-clustered outputs led to the identification of inaccuracies in several models. Such findings exemplify the benefit of exercising these benchmarks and using the presented methods to test DFN flow and transport models. • Discrete fracture network (DFN) benchmarks for flow and transport were defined. • Eight international teams simulated the DFN benchmarks. • Different meshing approaches were tested: DFN and upscaling methods. • Moment analysis provided valuable quantitative comparisons and verification. • Refined meshing at fracture intersections greatly improved DFN model results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Published
2025-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2025.100647
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrete fracture network model benchmarks developed and applied in a DECOVALEX-2023 repository performance assessment study

Auli Niemi, Zhenze Li, Emily Stein, Jeffrey D. Hyman et al.
1 citations
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.80
article

Discrete fracture network model benchmarks developed and applied in a DECOVALEX-2023 repository performance assessment study

Auli Niemi, Zhenze Li, Emily Stein, Jeffrey D. Hyman, Jan Thiedau, Scott Briggs, Rosie Leone, Paul Mariner, Yongmin Kim, Son Nguyen, Jungwoo Kim, Chieh-Chun Chang, Ondrej Mikláš, Nicholas I. Osuji, Mark Gobien
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents newly developed benchmarks for modeling flow and transport within discrete fracture networks (DFNs) and useful methods for analyzing the results. The new benchmarks are designed to test modeling approaches for use in probabilistic performance assessment models of deep geologic repositories in fractured rock. The benchmarks simulate flow and transport through a 1 km³ block of fractured rock. The first simulates migration of a short pulse of tracer through a simple network of four intersecting fractures. The second adds 1089 stochastically generated fractures. The third changes the pulse to a continuous point source. Evaluation of model performance relies on moment analysis and comparison of the results of different models. The expected nondimensional first moment of the conservative tracer for each benchmark is 1. The benchmarks were simulated by teams from Canada, Czechia, Germany, Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United States as part of a DECOVALEX-2023 study (decovalex.org). The teams used various approaches, including explicit DFN modeling, DFN upscaling to an equivalent continuous porous medium (ECPM), and a combination of both methods. Transport mechanisms are modeled using either the advection-dispersion equation or particle tracking. Results demonstrate strong agreement among the models in breakthrough behavior up to the 75th percentile. Significant deviations in first moments and well-clustered outputs led to the identification of inaccuracies in several models. Such findings exemplify the benefit of exercising these benchmarks and using the presented methods to test DFN flow and transport models. • Discrete fracture network (DFN) benchmarks for flow and transport were defined. • Eight international teams simulated the DFN benchmarks. • Different meshing approaches were tested: DFN and upscaling methods. • Moment analysis provided valuable quantitative comparisons and verification. • Refined meshing at fracture intersections greatly improved DFN model results.

Geomechanics for Energy and the EnvironmentVol. 41
Uppsala University (SE), Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (DE), Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CA), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KR), Sandia National Laboratories California (US), Nuclear Waste Management Organization (CA), Sandia National Laboratories (US), Institute of Nuclear Energy Research (TW), Radioactive Waste Repository Authority (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.